If this was posted before, I couldn't locate it. I have no idea if this guy is right or not. If he is, the implications are enormous.
For me, it will be almost as gratifying to see another case where the expert consensus of the experts in their area of expertize is shown to be so much bovine fertilizer. And if this isn't such a case? Well, we'll just have to wait till another one does come along.
This article also appeared in the Pittsburgh Post Gazette, June 11, 2001, under the title "Oil forever"
1 posted on
11/19/2001 10:07:24 AM PST by
Aurelius
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
To: Aurelius
Speaking of "weird science," what happened to the guy with the big "change the world" transportation invention that was gonna be announced? They were calling it "IT" as I recall. (Hey, that line should be in the Pirates of Penzance.)
To: Aurelius
bump for further investigation, looks interesting.
To: Aurelius
bump!
75 posted on
11/19/2001 12:23:22 PM PST by
VOA
To: Aurelius
This article is old news and incomplete. Published last year was an article that showed our old, depleted oil wells were being naturally replenished.
76 posted on
11/19/2001 12:23:30 PM PST by
cinFLA
To: chadsworth
ping )))) what u think bout this?
To: Aurelius
He is nuts.
95 posted on
11/19/2001 7:39:33 PM PST by
boris
To: Aurelius
And petrified wood happens in an instant?
102 posted on
11/19/2001 8:18:41 PM PST by
GOPJ
To: Aurelius
BTTT
To: Aurelius
The only limited and countable resource out there is human beings. Yet we abort them. We scream about burning virtualy unlimited or at least uncountable fuel, but humans, we don't scream at burning them even though we are very limited in numbers.
To: Aurelius
You can go back much further than Gold on this theory. The Russian, Oparin, who set up the framework for most of the scientific theory on pre-living evolution, postulated an organic rich layer of material on the earth's surface.
This layer would consist of large quantities of hydrocarbons and would probably be the basis of most of our petroleum sources. [It is likely that methane would not be involved to the extent postulated by Gold.]
To: Aurelius
RUSH WAS RIGHT!
...however the green cheese quote has me worried.
To: Aurelius
I have always looked upon the term "fossil fuel" as pure BS.
To: COB1
?????????????????????????????
To: Aurelius
Scientist stirs the cauldron: oil, he says, is renewableI WANT to believe him (I really, really want this theory to be true), but I also want more evidence first.
167 posted on
11/20/2001 6:15:46 PM PST by
xm177e2
To: Aurelius
Hmmmm...this suggests that it is our *duty* to consume fossil fuels!
To: Aurelius;Energy_List
To find all articles tagged or indexed using above index words
Go here: OFFICIAL BUMP(TOPIC)LIST
and then click the topic to initiate the search! !
To: Aurelius
BUMP
But, but....
207 posted on
05/29/2005 10:28:00 AM PDT by
whd23
To: Aurelius; Admin Moderator
Are posts being randomly removed from this thread?
I haven't seen anything wrong with any of them.
To: Aurelius
Please don't break out the tin-foil but Immanuel Velikovsky reasoned that there was vastly too much petroleum for it to have come from fossil sources and wondered at the mechanism that could turn flesh and bone into oil. Instead, he reasoned, it seems much more likely to have condensed with the other constituent elements and compounds that formed the earth and was as randomly distributed as gold deposits.
209 posted on
05/29/2005 11:00:00 AM PDT by
muir_redwoods
(Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopeckne is walking around free)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson