[concerned about politics]

But I read "proof" it was a bird!

I read "Proof" that it was engine failure.

I've read "proof" that the tail fell off in the wind!

We have all kinds of Experts here at FR. !!!

The many witnesses must be lying about an explosion and fire. That's the only way all the "proofs" can be right. We all know witnesses aren't valid.

By the way, I'm one of those "conspiracy freaks, loonies, tin foilers, stupid posters" that said there were people who saw an explosion and a fire.

Only the FR "experts" are allowed to be right!

Erase this article and the thread that goes with it. The author MUST be lying!

[Dan Day]

But I read "proof" it was a bird!

You're lying. Strike one.

I read "Proof" that it was engine failure.

Another lie. Strike two.

I've read "proof" that the tail fell off in the wind!

No you haven't -- you've read instrument data that said the aircraft experienced strong turbulance, and people are examining the possibility that this may have overstressed the tail.

Strike three, you're out. Go collect your tinfoil hat, you've earned it.

[Trust but Verify]

You read 'proof' about nothing, just theories and opinions.