Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GailA
At least it sounds like everyone else involved has some sense.

Poorer children, on the whole, DO achieve less in school. I'm not sure if this is because they CAN'T do as well. Most of them are from single-parent homes, often the parents are very young and don't have a clue, many of the parents don't have a lot of time for child-rearing (whether it's because they are working or partying), and on the whole there isn't as much emphasis put on education as there would be in middle-class homes.

On the other hand, if you expect less of these children, you get what President Bush expressed so well as "the soft bigotry of low expectations" -- the children end up undereducated, with no job skills to speak of, and continue the cycle of poverty.

What they need is something along the lines of parochial schools for at least the elementary grades, IMO.

3 posted on 11/17/2001 6:07:48 AM PST by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Amelia
My parents had 5th and 6th grade educations. They made sure I had the proper tools to do my school work, but beyond that I received no help from them, as they made it CLEAR it was my responsibility to LEARN what I was taught. When I left the 8th grade I could read at the 12th grade level. I graduated HS from an inner city school in Hammond, Ind. Middle of my class of 365 students. Of course this was PRE-dumb down the kids era. 1953-1966.
5 posted on 11/17/2001 1:23:18 PM PST by GailA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson