Yeah, I remember that, as well. And he was the one who carried out O.J.'s bag of tricks right after the murder. Dunne was the grey-haired gentleman at the trial wearing a bow tie, and he had such a shocked, upset look on his face when the verdict came in.
As for the "O.J.'s son did it" theory, a friend of mine had that very theory, but I decided when I heard it that it was bogus for several reasons:
* How do you explain the cuts on O.J.'s hands right after the murder,
* Why did O.J. have so many different alibis for what he was doing that night -- an innocent man would have had one,
* What about the "ugly-ass" Bruno Magli shoes -- does his son wear his father's shoes? Are they even the same size?
* How about the gloves -- did his son wear his father's gloves as well? The son and daughter (not Nicole's kids, the ones from the previous marriage) were not particularly close with their father until they would paraded around after the murder. They weren't living at the house before then.
* The DNA evidence incriminated O.J., not his son (his son would have DNA material from his mother, not just O.J. -- the only way the DNA would be the same is if they were identical twins!)
* And finally, and most importantly, although I do think O.J. was tipped off as to the verdict beforehand (word has it someone told him the night before), he had no guarantee until then that he would be found not guilty. O.J. is simply too selfish and narcissistic to ever take the fall for his son and risk going to jail for life. I just can't buy it, with his personality makeup. (For the same reasons, I never bought the theory that the Jon-Benet Ramsey's son killed her, and the parents covered it up.) Anyhow, I will check out this author's theory, and see how he explains how the son could have been guilty.