Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chad
The "smoke" could have been one of the following or both. When the tail broke, atomized high pressure hot hydraulic fluid spewing out of open lines. Also the plane was supposedly dumping fuel at the time. Either event looks like smoke and sometimes can only be verified by another plane up close.
26 posted on 11/16/2001 1:22:03 PM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Hillarys Gate Cult
Also the plane was supposedly dumping fuel at the time.

during the "Pataki theory" thread, it was discovered that Airbus 300-600 was incapable of a fuel dump. The fuel "somehow" managed to get into the water some other way.

29 posted on 11/16/2001 1:22:06 PM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult
This plane can't dump fuel.
72 posted on 11/16/2001 1:23:05 PM PST by chemainus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult
Also the plane was supposedly dumping fuel at the time.

The fuel dumping theory was discredited early on. This type of aircraft can't dump fuel in flight.

73 posted on 11/16/2001 1:23:05 PM PST by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult
Also the plane was supposedly dumping fuel at the time

Huh??? An airplane dumping fuel one minute after takeoff on an international trip - yeah right.

140 posted on 10/30/2002 6:41:52 AM PST by BearCub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson