To: The Magical Mischief Tour
I ain't goin' along with the "it fell apart because it hit wind" story...
To: Libloather
I think it felt turbulence when the tail fell off in sections. The first buffeting was the left side seperation (or lower) and the second was the right side separation. The turbulence didn't cause the seperation, rather the separation caused the turbulence.
21 posted on
11/16/2001 1:22:02 PM PST by
tbeatty
To: Libloather
I ain't goin' along with the "it fell apart because it hit wind" story...BOTH engines come off and land in different locations. The vertical fin separates cleanly from the aircraft. I ain't buyin the wake turbulence explanation as the sole cause of this crash either!
24 posted on
11/16/2001 1:22:03 PM PST by
teletech
To: Libloather
I ain't goin' along with the "it fell apart because it hit wind" story...First time I heard that I thought maybe they also had a bridge they wanted to sell. BTW, how many times has a plane taken off 15 seconds too soon in another plane's wake? Must be never cuz this is the first one that's fallen apart in the air.
86 posted on
11/16/2001 1:24:01 PM PST by
FrdmLvr
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson