[gjenkins]

"This is about you having an attitude that Harry Browne is still a candidate. If you wanted an honest debate, you'd include Gore, but you've had many opportunities to do that, haven't you?"

I don't like Gore. I dislike Gore far more than I like Bush (and I do like Bush just a little bit). I am not talking about Harry Browne at all. Bye Bye.

[AlGone2001]

Let me see if I understand your rules....

1. It's okay for you to go off-subject and declare that President Bush would not not have been elected had it not been for his father.

2. It's not okay for me to ask you why you did not attribute the same luxury to Gore?

Are those the rules by which you play?

[AlGone2001]

I don't like Gore. I dislike Gore far more than I like Bush (and I do like Bush just a little bit). I am not talking about Harry Browne at all. Bye Bye. Please don't go. So, it seems that you dislike Gore very much, but perhaps like President Bush only a little? Oh, and now that I've introduced Browne, I got close to home. You don't want to talk about Gore, since that pushes President Bush way to the right. You don't want that comparison, do you? I'll remember that. Thanks.

I thought that the libertarians were for more than a 2-party system? If so, let's discuss Gore's luck, too. Hmmm?