Lord knows I try but I'm a little weak on "Coincidence Theory". I should think that the Bush Family itself (enamoured as they are of "sending a message") understand this sort of thing perfectly well.
You're backtracking here. First you insinuate that Bush was behind's Reagan's assassination attempt. Then you say that he wasn't, but the evil "they" who were behind it were sending him a message. Wow, spooky -- one of Bush's five children knew one of John Hinckley's brothers. And what was this "psuedo-MESSAGE," as you call it? It's a pretty weak one, if you ask me.
Ludicrous.
The Hinkley connection (including supping with Neil) was just supposed to rub it in our faces or what?