Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Smogger
This back and forth heckling is really becoming humerous. I personally think that the odds are that this was an intentional act, but anyone who wants to think differently is certainly entitled to.

What I DON'T understand is the hysteria that ensues from the "accident" prone folks here. Believe what you want, but the bickering is silly.

55 posted on 11/16/2001 1:10:35 PM PST by EggsAckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: EggsAckley
What I DON'T understand is the hysteria that ensues from the "accident" prone folks here. Believe what you want, but the bickering is silly.

What I'm having a tough time with is people who imply that there is a conspiacy going on, but don't want to go all the way by admitting it.

If anyone here thinks that our government is conspiring against us, have the guts to say it. Don't deny it from one side of your mouth, while you say that some government employees have their own aganda out of the other. Just say it. Why is that asking too much?

I'm just looking for a little honesty here.

60 posted on 11/16/2001 1:10:39 PM PST by AlGone2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: EggsAckley
This back and forth heckling is really becoming humerous. I personally think that the odds are that this was an intentional act, but anyone who wants to think differently is certainly entitled to

It is rather amusing isn't it. Some people bristle at the mere suggestion that the government might be off base with their investigation. Then they accuse anyone that suggests such of being a conspiracy wacko. I can think of plenty of reasons other than a conspiracy the government might be beating the wrong bush.

61 posted on 11/16/2001 1:10:40 PM PST by Smogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: EggsAckley
This back and forth heckling is really becoming humerous. I personally think that the odds are that this was an intentional act, but anyone who wants to think differently is certainly entitled to.

I have no problem with people who lean in another direction either. But you're in error if you think that's the motivation for the "heckling" on these threads.

What I DON'T understand is the hysteria that ensues from the "accident" prone folks here. Believe what you want, but the bickering is silly.

The only "hysteria" I've seen has been coming from the "IT WAS SABOTAGE, THE GOVERNMENT'S GOING TO COVER IT UP, AND YOU SHEEPLE ARE BUYING IT!!" folks.

The "accident prone folks" are just rolling their eyes and saying, "oh, come *on*...."

I have absolutely nothing against the people who are leaning towards sabotage. I *do* have something against the wild-eyed folks who insist that it has to be sabotage, period, only an idiot would fail to agree with them, and that "everybody knows" that coverup conspiracies are the order of the day for plane crashes.

Even your own post which starts this thread edges into that territory, postulating government efforts to mislead in service to some nefarious agenda, and your thread title has the tone of, "mwuahaha, accident theories are dropping like flies, it's only a matter of time before The Truth(tm) comes out!"

Give me a break.

70 posted on 11/16/2001 1:10:43 PM PST by Dan Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson