baaaa baaaa.. Be honest are you a sheep?
Did you anywhere in my post find me referring to a conspiracy? Can't people just be inept or biased anymore?
I can't believe you asked me that...
You just call them accident theories.
Since the morning of the crash of flight 587. Government officials including the NTSB have made every effort to convince the public that the plane crash was the result of an accident and not a deliberate act.
That sounds to me as though you are accusing them of a conspiracy. If you didn't think it was a conspiracy, why didn't you simply state that "Government officials including the NTSB have told us that the plane crash was the result of an accident and not a deliberate act."?
So far they have floated several accident theories that have been proven false. If they really believe that it is a problem with the Airbus one wonders why they don't ground that plane.
Here you sound as though you believe that the government is purposefully flying the aricraft, even though they know there is a problem.
How else can I read you?