Posted on 11/16/2001 1:09:13 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
Edited on 04/13/2004 3:29:03 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
WASHINGTON -- Safety records show the American Airlines plane that crashed in New York was severely shaken by air turbulence seven years earlier in an episode that injured 47 people.
One possibility safety investigators are considering is that the Airbus A300 broke apart Monday after hitting turbulence from the plane taking off before it at Kennedy International Airport.
(Excerpt) Read more at bayarea.com ...
Damage that wasn't detected for 7 years seems alot worse for business than a terrorist attack.
But trying to tie this to turbulence 7 years ago seems to be a bit of reach.
Why not take a look at the corrosion problems of the rear bulkhead of the Japanese A300 encountered earlier this year.
With this in mind, if this crash turns out to be not from a terrorist act, then I think every passenger has the right to see the safety records of an aircraft before they board it.....
Also AA and all other airlines that own AB300s need to ground them all until it is proven that they are safe for flight.
It saves weight, too. The American's fleet is already natural aluminum, though, with the exception of the logo and longitudinal red, white, and blue stripes.
Let's keep air travel deaths in perspective here. 587 took the equivalent of two days of traffic fatalities in this country. If this is determined to be an accident (and I'm still waiting for the final report), does that mean you will never fly again? Does it change the fact that air travel is still safer than your car?
The part of the tail that stands up straight is called the 'vertical stabilizer'; the hinged bit on the back of this is called the 'rudder'.
The little wings at the back are the 'horizontal stabilizers'; the hinged bits at the backs of these are the 'elevators'.
'Stab' is an accepted contraction for 'stabilizer'.
1) Start admitting the crash is, at least, very very suspicious and that it could turn out to have been a bomb or sabotage. That would amount to admitting OBL could still reach out and touch NYC at a time when W was giving a big speech and the UNGA was meeting. And it would amount to admitting that our airport security is a joke.
2) Ground all AB300s. This would, of course, risk the wrath of every carrier that flies that plane, our European allies, and every government that has, so far, shut up about the possibility it was a terrorist act. All these parties would cease to be quiet and start getting very loud about our handling of the investigation.
If you are the kind of bureaucrat who thinks things are best handled without the public knowing what is going on, all option are beginning to suck. They don't say "Honesty is the best policy" for nothing.
True, except that most high speed aircraft, certainly modern ones, have all flying horizontal tail surfaces. Meaning that the whole thing moves, rather than just having a hinged part at the rear that does so. The Airbus A-300 has such a horizontal stab, as do the Boeing 757 and 767.
Not bogus. Most accidents have two or more co-factors.
Has anyone ever done the stats on the number of people on the road in any given day vs. in the air? I wonder how it is really determined that air travel is safer.
If it was terrorists people don't want to fly.
If it was mechanical failure people don't want to fly.
Seems the only "turbulence" is being caused by citizens as they flee the airports and head for the highways.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.