Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dumb_Ox
Do you belive that the only reason they punished people for having a Bible was because it was expensive?
143 posted on 11/16/2001 1:14:57 PM PST by SKempis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]


To: SKempis
Do you belive that the only reason they punished people for having a Bible was because it was expensive?

Who said anything about punishing people for having a Bible? Certain translations were no doubt suppressed, as counterfeit currency or fraudulent deeds would have been destroyed. This was a particular problem with the advent of the printing press, when any man with a bit of money and some Greek and Latin could crank out a version. But Sir Thomas More, in his Dialogue Concerning Heresies, notes that English law only forbade Luther and Tyndale-influenced versions, as those were of dubious accuracy and deviated from Christian orthodoxy. More, being a man of Law himself, should know more about then-contemporary English law than either of us. I will not speak about the rest of European law, since I am less familiar with its Reformation-era history.

167 posted on 11/16/2001 1:18:16 PM PST by Dumb_Ox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson