Posted on 11/16/2001 1:04:30 PM PST by 11B3
The lazy a$$holes in this country don't deserve to be woken from their sleep. Here we are fully awake, and they're targeting us because of it. _uck them - now I'm pissed instead of worried! The feces are going to hit the fan on this one - and they even ADMITTED that this is true!!! Thanks to all who replied.
What about the other issue? I believe in the Constitution, am I a terrorist?
Please tell me oh great one! (ha, ha)
Oh, please, give it a rest already. Even Chicken Little wasn't so nutso!
For the eleventynineth time, it does NOT say "Christians", it says "Christian Identity".
One of those things is not like the other.
Oh, please, give it a rest already. Even Chicken Little wasn't so nutso!
For the eleventynineth time, it does NOT say "Christians", it says "Christian Identity".
One of those things is not like the other.
Who decides what?
That it says "Christian Identity"?
OK, fine, I decided it says "Christian Identity."
Go ahead and argue that it doesn't! I double-dare ya!
Don't forget to get your liscence before you start swinging that wet noodle in public
You may resume conversation now
Take a deep breath. You're hysterical. What you're doing is tantamount to claiming that Baptists who wear lab coats at work are "Christian Scientists."
I'm telling y'all, the more you rant and rave about this, the more you convince people that you're standing up to defend CI, the KKK, and so forth. Because whether you realize it or not, that's exactly what you're doing!
Get back with me when you sober up, OK? I see there's no point in trying to reason with someone who attacks me for arguing against rising to the defense of a bunch of neo-nazis.
Now "defenders of the constitution" are suspects for domestic terrorism?
If this pamphlet is not a joke, we are in deep trouble, because millions of us who swore an oath to "defend the constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign AND DOMESTIC" will not disregard that oath.
If there is not a better prescription for the causing of a civil war I can't think of it. LEOs and FLEOs are asked both to take an oath to defend the constitution, and regard defenders of the constittion as potential terrorists.
The seeds of a real conflict are seen in this pamphlet, because today under the so-called "Patriot Act of 2001" (anti terrorism law just passed 99-1) suspects in terrorism cases fall into a category which takes away most of their civil rights and due process protections.
When people like Timothy McVeigh say they are the defenders of the US Constitution.
The FBI also missed putting in that Timothy McVeigh considered himself a "Libertarian".
administrator@campbell.senate.gov ; senator_allard@exchange.senate.gov ;rep.paul@mail.house.gov ; amycar@aol.com Cc: mailto:"rush@eib.net ; alex@infowars.com ; radiolib@aol.com ; mspain6581@aol.com ; thompson@lvsun.com ; chronletters@sfgate.com ; letters@usnews.com ; netaudr@abc.com ; Dateline@NBC.com ; abramowitz@washpost.com ; newswatch@foxnews.com ; letters@nationalreview.com ; letters@nytimes.com ; city@thestar.ca; christinaleaonard@arizonarepublic.com
How 'bout the Demorats? Assassination (character and arkanicide) is a terrorist modus operandi! Don't they qualify?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.