Interesting. I hate to use this analogy then, but you've forced me into it.
It is the mid-1940s. A Jewish boy escapes Germany; his mother dies in the attempt. Now US authorities hear from the Germany Kommissar of such-and-such that The Father Is Still In Germany And Wants His Boy Back.
Clearly "a boy belongs with his father", and you "don't think it should make a difference between countries", so therefore, you send the Jewish boy back on the next boat to Nazi Germany.
Correct?
Correct. There's no doubt that Castro's Cuba is tantamount to Nazi Germany 90 miles off our coast. What Libs should be asking themselves is how could they allow that communist gulag to exist for soo long, it is an infamnia and Castro is a slap in the face to civilization as Hitler was.
For example, he thinks the father had unquestionable right to be with his boy -- that is unless of course more people happened to walk by the house the boy was staying at with certain flags. In that case father's rights are out the window in JD's reasoning.
Can't argue with logic like that.