[mommadooo3]

On other threads, 'they' said that they heard no one rushing into the cockpit, etc, to indicate a terrorist crash. So, therefore, 'they' think it was 'just' an accident.

If a bomb went off in the baggage compartment, does it usually announce' I think it's time for me to blow up'????

[maquiladora]

But would a bomb in the luggage comparment blow off an engine at the end of a wing and sheer off the tailsection at different times but leave the rest if the plane intact?

This is still quite strange, the more I think about it, the less sure i am about anything

[firewalk]

It could have also been an act of sabotage during maintenance? Whatever it was, I don't believe this plane crash was an accident.

[Nimitz]

Well put. Your on the right track.

[MizSterious]

LOL--to my knowledge, we don't have anounceable bombs yet! That's one of the things I found odd too, but there are more. I do believe coincidences occur, but so many? It happened 2 months and 1 day after 9/11. It happened in NYC. It happened in the time frame the terrorists seem to prefer--8-9 a.m. It occurred just after (yet another) "general" warning to be on alert for terrorist activity. It occurred after OBL gave a speech saying more planes would fall out of the sky.

It does not particularly comfort me when people who have not yet retrieved the wreckage--let alone examined it--immediately and forcefully state that it was an accident. It comforts me still less when they mention this just after stating that if it's a terrorist attack, it will kill off the airline industry. (As if mechanical defaults will make any of us feel more comfortable about flying!)