Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MeeknMing
I was hoping they would have found Al Gore was the definite winner. I love to hear Dumocrats whine.
2 posted on 11/12/2001 1:23:52 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Always Right
This is even better than I hoped. It shows that if Gore had not try to cheat - "recounting" in only those counties that were favorable to him - then he may have had a shot.

Strategy backfire, eh Al? tehehe

8 posted on 11/12/2001 1:37:44 AM PST by BlueCat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Always Right
Actaully, even these Leftist creeps found Bush won, they just hid behind a bunch of lies.

Who but a Gore supporter would have the interest and drive to "count" these votes when it is settled legal and historical fact thjat Bush won, ---- now for the 8th and 9th time!

As I noted above, counting over-votes and under-votes requires "hallucintaion" and "mind-reading" because over votes involve voting TWICE and under votes involve not voting at all for the office!

You musdt mind-read to count over-votes and you must halllucinate to count une\der-votes; I know, I saw hundreds of ballots --very close up --- in PB County as a Bush volunteer vote observer.

13 posted on 11/12/2001 2:00:21 AM PST by FReethesheeples
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson