Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jrherreid
A thoughtful response to these criticisms can be found in Alan Jacob's essay, "Harry Potter's Magic" in the January 2000 issue of First Things.

Correction: a pretentious English professor's essay can be found in "First Things."

Perhaps the most important question I could ask my Christian friends who mistrust the Harry Potter books is this: is your concern about the portrayal of this imaginary magical technology matched by a concern for the effects of the technology that in our world displaced magic? The technocrats of this world hold in their hands powers almost infinitely greater than those of Albus Dumbledore and Voldemort: how worried are we about them, and their influence over our children? Not worried enough, I would say.

Perhaps I could answer "the most important question" if it made some sense.

But let me address this comprehensible question:

The technocrats of this world hold in their hands powers almost infinitely greater than those of Albus Dumbledore and Voldemort: how worried are we about them, and their influence over our children?

I assume that he's speaking of nuclear weapons and such. If that is the case, then his statement is infinitely wrong. Death is not the worst thing we have to fear. The thing we have to fear is the loss of God –the loss of our salvation. The professor's assertion is the assertion of a modern materialist, not a Christian. And anything that can enkindle a child's interest in the occult is of the greatest danger.

Anyway, here are the reasons that most Christians that I know are critical of the series:

1) Most witches and wizards in the books use their supernatural powers for good. Therefore, good children can reasonably conclude that good people can use witchcraft and wizardry. However, evil means, such as witchcraft, can never be used to bring about good ends. Christians of all denominations regard witchcraft and wizardry as an abomination, as it is clearly categorized in the Bible.

2) Children can empathize with Harry. Harry's not a bad guy. Harry's a wizard. This normalizes wizardry.

3) Children are exposed to occult practices (casting spells and the like) and grotesque scenes (drinking of blood; one character severs his own arm and casts it into a cauldron to make his spell efficacious).

12 posted on 11/09/2001 9:26:20 AM PST by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Aquinasfan
You might make the exact same criticisms of Tolkien's Lord of the Rings. For example, Gandalf uses magic on several occasions. The Dwarves have a spell cast over their gate at Moria that has to be opened with the correct word. The Barrow-Wight sequence is rather gruesome, ending with a severed hand crawling away by use of it's fingers. The elves use magic to heal Frodo after he is infected by the weapons of the Nazgul. On and on and on. But for some reason this stuff is ok, but in Harry Potter it is demonic. Why?
13 posted on 11/09/2001 9:36:58 AM PST by jrherreid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson