Land won in a war is stolen land and your claim that there is a difference simply proves your moral bankruptcy. This would be true even if your claim that "Arabs attacked, other Arabs fled" were true - and it's not. Israeli terrorists, including at least one who later became Prime Minister, were engaging in ethnic cleansing before the British left Palestine and the Arab countries launched their ineffectual attack.
More leftist nonsense.
This is rich, coming from someone who supports the socialist state of Israel.
Nonsense. Land won in war is conquered land. No one agrees with you on this one. If this is really true than have your Muslims return all the Christian land they conquered ten centuries ago. Have America return land to the Indians who I suppose farmed it. LOL
and your claim that there is a difference simply proves your moral bankruptcy. This would be true even if your claim that "Arabs attacked, other Arabs fled" were true - and it's not.
Of course it's true. Some fled and some were driven. And 800,000 Jews were driven (and some fled) from Arab lands. This is what sinks your argument. You can never admit to these Jewish refugees driven from Arab lands
Israeli terrorists, including at least one who later became Prime Minister, were engaging in ethnic cleansing before the British left Palestine and the Arab countries launched their ineffectual attack.
Not the Jews fault if Arab armies are armies of losers. They certainly have the numbers so what's the problem?
More leftist nonsense.
This is rich, coming from someone who supports the socialist state of Israel.
America turned socialist during WW2. All nations at war and under attack turn somewhat socialist. Israel has a more capitalist economy than any Arab nation. Syria is so primitive it's run along Stalinist lines complete with 5 year plans.