To make it short and sweet, you're not even worth posting to; as somebody said up the thread, you have never in all these months given ONE INCH on your agenda; carry on; you'll be the last person on earth who actually believes Larry Klayman. Or at least admit it; you're so far into your JW rant, you'll never be able to come on this board and admit you've been wrong.
I swear, if there were no Klayman threads, you'd post it to yourself.
You are a bogus poster. And boring, to boot!
Yep, that's our low I. Q. Howlin - sure is, poor thang.
And I'll go on asking the same questions from now on. Don't think that I'll sit back and let democRATS change the history books as far as Clinton and Klayman are concerned. Don't think that I'll let NEW Republicans act like democRATS without a challenge. I'll keep asking the questions that you won't answer whenever you try to do your part to protect Clinton and the DNC from the crimes they committed.
For the last year, you have typed that same drivel to whoever you can engage in an argument.
Well it must matter to you because you keep trying to defend an indefensible definition of "evidence", and about all you can do vis a vis my questions is call what I say "drivel". You can make snide remarks about Hillary and her looks all all you want and I won't care one way or the other. You can focus everybody's attention on Condit from now till eternity and I won't stop you. You can make nasty remarks about Clinton and keep suggesting that he will "fade away" till he finally does. You can even criticize Klayman's attempts recently to go after Bush (especially if you can PROVE with FACTS that Klayman is wrong) and I might even applaud you. But don't try and suggest that there was nothing to Filegate, Emailgate, Chinagate, the death of Brown, the death of Foster, the Riady non-refund. Don't try and suggest Klayman never did anything to help us learn about the crimes that occurred under the Clinton regime. Don't try and suggest Bush "move on" and ignore credible evidence suggesting those crimes. Because when you do ... I'll be there making people wonder what you are really all about.
To make it short and sweet, you're not even worth posting to; as somebody said up the thread, you have never in all these months given ONE INCH on your agenda;
What? I should give because you can't dispute the EVIDENCE that suggests Ron Brown was murdered (and 35 others along with him) because he was about to testify that he, Clinton and his party were engaged in actions that many might call TREASONOUS?
What? I should give on Filegate, where SWORN TESTIMONY by many individuals suggests that Hillary Clinton, the Clinton administration and the DNC engaged in a CRIMINAL conspiracy to ILLEGALLY gather data on perhaps THOUSANDS of prominent Republicans, ILLEGALLY put that data in a DNC database, and probably use it to BLACKMAIL those people into doing what the DNC wants?
What? I should give on Chinagate, where SWORN TESTIMONY and documents clearly suggest that the Clinton administration SOLD OUT THIS COUNTRY to the Red Chinese for CAMPAIGN CASH inorder to STEAL several Presidential elections and where the DNC allowed foreign powers to ILLEGALLY influence this countries election process ... a process as sacred as the judicial process which the Clinton administration also clearly subverted?
What? I should give on the Riady Non-Refund where the Clinton and DNC campaign organizations clearly took MILLIONS in ILLEGAL dollars from a foreign power, when caught said they returned the money because they "didn't know", then did NOT return the money but used it to try and steal a Presidential election?
Tell me, Howlin. Why would ANY REAL CONSERVATIVE ask another to give ONE INCH on those matters? Why would ANY REAL CONSERVATIVE be afraid to debate the facts in those matters?
carry on; you'll be the last person on earth who actually believes Larry Klayman.
This isn't about Klayman any longer, Howlin. This is about whether you are really a conservative ... a Republican ... or not. Tell us ... why don't you believe Ron Brown was murdered? Why does suggesting that Vince Foster did not commit suicide at Marcy Park give the GOP a bad name?
Or at least admit it; you're so far into your JW rant,
No. YOU are the one into a JW rant. You show up on EVERY thread having to do with him (unless of course it is something that actually shows his work has/had merit) to blast him. I only appear when you, or someone like you, steps over the line and suggests he never accomplished anything or that the Clinton scandals were "bogus".
You are a bogus poster. And boring, to boot!
Go ahead Howlin. Run like you ALWAYS do from the FACTS. Or tell us why you don't believe that Ron Brown was murdered.