I'm busted because I said what I've been saying for years -- that Klayman is an ambulance chaser? You've droned on and on about all of Larry's accomplishments; and I, like the rest of the people on these threads, have kept asking the same thing for months: what has he DONE? what has he WON? when will he EVER win?
Why do you insist on twisting people's words to make it sound like if they don't agree with Larry they must be Democrats and unpatriotic.
Are you typing from an insane asylum?
Your problem is that you actually BELIEVE Klayman's press releases. I never have. Ever.
No Howlin. Not because he is acting like an ambulance chaser (recently). Read what YOU wrote: "He's lawsuits, regardless of whoever they are against, are bogus. And that is EXACTLY what I've been saying since the very beginning." You either refuse to believe that his Chinagate, Filegate, Emailgate and Ron Brown suits were about more than the actual CIVIL accusation (he CLEARLY was using them as a vehicle to uncover CRIMINAL violations) or you as suggesting that he should have restricted his Chinagate, Filegate, Emailgate and Ron Brown cases to ONLY the CIVIL matters and that those matters were bogus. The first means that you don't have a clue what he was about and the second means that you would rather that WE have remained in the dark about the many Clinton/DNC crimes he helped expose. The latter also means you claim those CIVIL matters were bogus when Judge Lamberth allowed them to proceed for YEARS ... something that I doubt he would have allowed had the matters just been so obviously bogus, as you suggest. I'd rather not accuse you of being too "dense" to understand that (as you have accused me) so I'll assume that you are quite intelligent and therefore your intent must be to keep us in the dark about the Clinton/DNC CRIMINAL matters and defend Clinton from the CIVIL accusations. That suggests you are a democRAT.
You've droned on and on about all of Larry's accomplishments; and I, like the rest of the people on these threads, have kept asking the same thing for months: what has he DONE? what has he WON? when will he EVER win?
And in response I have listed multiple times some of Clinton/DNC CRIMINAL crimes that his efforts exposed. THAT is his accomplishment regardless of whether he has brought the CIVIL matters to a conclusion or not. You on the other hand, when asked repeatedly to discuss those matters that Klayman exposed have RUN. You won't discuss Brown. You won't discuss Chinagate. Your discussion of Filegate consisted of implying that Linda Tripp lied in her depositions. As anyone reading this thread will see, I always attempt to address the specific points made the other side. You NEVER address the points raised by the other side. Instead you debate like a democRAT would.
Why do you insist on twisting people's words to make it sound like if they don't agree with Larry they must be Democrats and unpatriotic.
For the most part, I have no problem with people criticizing Klayman's recent methods and targets. I've said so on many occasions. I only chime into these threads when the discussion strays to suggesting that NOTHING Klayman did ever had merit. That's a lie that deserves to be challenged. Now, eplain why you don't believe Ron Brown was murdered.
Are you typing from an insane asylum?
Stop using democRAT debating techniques and explain why you don't think Ron Brown was murdered and why people who suggest he was give the GOP a bad name.
Your problem is that you actually BELIEVE Klayman's press releases. I never have. Ever.
I guess you were too lazy to actually go read the depositions that Klayman took or look at the documents he discovered during the Clinton years. Many were published on the web so you have no excuse. They cooberate everything he claimed in his press releases about Filegate, Chinagate and Emailgate. Other information that has been published here from time to time, from other sources, has also cooberated his press releases. For example, I guess you were too lazy to go listen to the interviews with Janoski that cooberates Klayman's press releases about Ron Brown. If you weren't lazy, then what reason can you have for not believing the press releases BACK THEN than a democRAT's dislike of Klayman?
For the most part, I have not tried to defend Klayman's recent behaviors because they do smack of chasing ambulances in some cases. But why do you insist on claiming that anything he ever did was worthless when that OBVIOUSLY is not true? The explanation I keep coming back to is that you are a democRAT and that is why you believe any Republican who thinks Brown was murdered or that Vince Foster didn't commit suicide at Marcy Park gives the GOP a bad name.