Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NoControllingLegalAuthority
Don't know. Haven't read all the posts yet but I have to wonder if Bush is not wanting to rouse public support by attacking the Clintons again.

We all witnessed the unprecidented support the Clintons received throughout all the scandals. Hitlery's litany of a right wing conspiracy began to ring true in the minds of too many voters -- it was only politics, she claimed. As appalling as it was, we all saw our fellow Americans put their morals aside and vote according to their pocketbooks. They didn't pay enough attention to politics to know that it was Bush 41's policies that Clinton rode in on, that Bush 41 was more responsible than Clinton for the prosperity of the 90's.

So generally, the public has shown its ignorance in its continued support of the Clintons. And maybe Bush 43'rd doesn't want to tread back into those waters. Maybe he just wants the Clintons out of the picture so that they do not get the opportunity to lie their way out of another scandal or prosecution, casting another dark cloud on republicans.

204 posted on 11/08/2001 10:19:34 PM PST by bjcintennessee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Askel5
The scales are falling off and it ain't pretty.
206 posted on 11/08/2001 10:39:32 PM PST by nunya bidness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]

To: bjcintennessee
So generally, the public has shown its ignorance in its continued support of the Clintons. And maybe Bush 43'rd doesn't want to tread back into those waters. Maybe he just wants the Clintons out of the picture so that they do not get the opportunity to lie their way out of another scandal or prosecution, casting another dark cloud on republicans.

SPIN SPIN SPIN. EXCUSES EXCUSES EXCUSES. The TRUTH is that the public didn't show its ignorance, the media showed its BIAS. The media never even told the public a fraction of the facts in most of these cases. I'll bet you that if you take a sampling of 100 people you MIGHT find 2 or 3 who know the circumstances surrounding Ron Brown's death. And you know why that is? Because the media NEVER reported those circumstances. They did just want the Clintons and DNC wanted them to do ... report it as an accident due to bad weather. NOT ONE major media outlet has EVER mentioned the statements of the pathologists, the x-ray and photos that suggest a bullet wound, the unusualness of no safety board, the lies of Gormley and Dickerson, the testimony implicating Clinton, etc. etc. etc. In fact, NOT ONE of the major media outlets ever even told the public during the impeachment trial of Bill Clinton that 2 of the 3 witnesses the House Managers were allowed to call were caught LYING UNDER OATH to protect themselves and Clinton, in a trial about LYING UNDER OATH! The major media (and GOP) has not even reported the Riady non-refund! And you can't deny this.

You are dreaming if you think this is going away. As long as Bush and the GOP will not investigate the Clinton crimes, then they can expect charges of coverup and corruption from LIFE LONG REPUBLICANS like me. NO EXCUSES. Exhume Brown's body and autopsy it in the presence of some of the whistleblowers, or be called to task for helping democRATS cover up an apparent MASS MURDER involving treason. Investigate the crimes or many life long REPUBLICANS will be wondering if we can EVER trust EITHER party again.

212 posted on 11/09/2001 8:06:49 AM PST by BeAChooser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson