You recall wrong. That's a very stupid argument; and it's a really stupid argument to make to a woman who spends ALL her time marking evidence in depositions and in a courtroom. I know what I am talking about; you don't.
*******
New Oxford Dictionary says: evidence
n Law information given personally, drawn from a document, or in the form of material objects, tending or used to establish facts in a legal investigation or admissible as testimony in a law court: without evidence, they can't bring a charge.
******
Again ... notice that last phrase "without evidence, they can't bring a charge." If what you say were true, no court could charge anyone with a crime because the court would have to meet and prove the facts true inorder to call those facts evidence and bring a charge. How else can one interpret this? Just because you are a court "reporter" doesn't mean you can ignore MULTIPLE dictionary definitions and simple logic. This isn't 1984 where 2+2 = 5.
My recollection isn't wrong. These are quotes from the discussion we had. And you know what? After I pointed out this last bit of logic to you ... you RAN. You had NO response. And you STILL apparently don't. EVERYONE can see that you are making up a definition of "evidence" to suit your purpose ... that of making sure that no crime committed by the Clintons and DNC is ever properly investigated. Like I said, I don't care what you call the circumstances surrounding Ron Brown's death and all these other scandals ... FACTS, DETAILS, EVIDENCE, QUESTIONS ... whatever. There is STILL sufficient reason to DEMAND an investigation. That is unless you think MURDER and TREASON by democRATS is something we should IGNORE.
And since you claim to be such an "expert", let's hear your reasons why YOU think Gormley and Dickerson were not lying in the Brown case? Let's hear YOUR reasons why you think Cogswell, Janoski and all the other whistleblowers in the Brown case were untruthful. Let's hear YOUR explanation for the failure of the Air Force to conduct a Safety Board and instead rule the crash due to pilot error and weather BEFORE any investigation has begun on the ground. Should be a simple matter for someone with you VAST expertise at watching people lie (as you claimed) and handling EVIDENCE. Come on, Howlin, stop RUNNING from the Brown case and tell us why you don't think he was murdered.