Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BUSH JUSTICE DEPARTMENT BLOCKS RENO DEPOSITION
Judicial Watch Press Release ^ | 11/8/01

Posted on 11/08/2001 1:57:39 PM PST by Rebeckie

11/8/2001

202-646-5172

BUSH JUSTICE DEPARTMENT BLOCKS RENO DEPOSITION

Latest Obstruction Prevents Scheduled Testimony In Defamation Case Against Accused Spy Wen Ho Lee

Last Minute Gamesmanship No Better than Clinton Justice Department

(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch, the public interest law firm that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, today criticized the Ashcroft Justice Department for obstructing a long scheduled deposition of former Attorney General Reno in whistleblower Notra Trulock defamation case against accused Chinese spy and admitted felon Wen Ho Lee. Trulock, the former chief of the Energy Department intelligence operations, is suing Lee and others for falsely accusing Trulock of racial bias while conducting an inquiry into the loss of America nuclear secrets from Energy Department labs. Former Attorney General Reno, who was subpoenaed last month, was expected to testify that Wen Ho Lee charges of racial bias had no basis in fact and that there was a legitimate basis to investigate Lee. The deposition of Ms. Reno was scheduled to take place tomorrow in Miami. Judicial Watch is representing Mr. Trulock in this matter.

Late yesterday afternoon, the Ashcroft Justice Department, through a fax from Assistant Attorney General Robert D. McCallum, Jr., unilaterally decided that Reno (and other witnesses such as former FBI Director Louis Freeh) would not appear as scheduled. Judicial Watch was told by a Justice Department lawyer that this decision was only made yesterday. (The Ashcroft Justice Department had known that Reno would be testifying in this case since June of this year.)

The Justice Department lawyers know they have no legal basis to prevent Ms. Reno from testifying at the last minute. Yet they think they are above the law and are contemptuous of the Court processes. The Ashcroft Justice Department has continually obstructed this case. Indeed, a federal court has already sanctioned them for similar conduct in this case. "Truth be told, in matters that Judicial Watch has been litigating, the ethics and practices of the Ashcroft Justice Department are no better than those of Reno Justice Department", stated Judicial Watch Chairman Larry Klayman.

"No one is above the law. And Judicial Watch will seek appropriate sanctions and plans to ask for an independent investigation by the Office of Professional Responsibility into the way the Wen Ho Lee case has been handled. These repeated obstructionist tactics by this Justice Department are most likely to cover up their ongoing negligence concerning the loss of virtually all of our nation nuclear secrets to China and other nations adverse to the United States", added Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340341-357 next last
To: ChaseR
Howlin, you sit your face down and read through this case...and you'll notice that three different govt. agencies objected to treasonous bastard Clinton signing all those waivers. You say your a court reporter, well then, you should easily be able to see that Klayman has the goods on filthbag Clinton, McAuliffe and the rest of the miserable, treasonous defendents. Now, you tell us Howlin, who else is so justly pursuing Chinagate, no one - just Judicial Watch!

Howlin promises all of us that she'll diligently review this devastating Loral case!! Huh Howlin!! Go! Start Now!!

321 posted on 11/25/2001 8:28:45 AM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
opps, another typo, let me hurry to correct this:
"Howlin, you sit your face down...You say you're a court reporter"
322 posted on 11/25/2001 8:31:33 AM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: All
Anybody know why Rebeckie got banned?

America's Fifth Column ... watch PBS documentary JIHAD! In America
Download 8 Mb zip file here (50 minute video)

323 posted on 11/25/2001 9:31:21 AM PST by JCG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

Comment #324 Removed by Moderator

To: ChaseR
You are making a fool of yourself. Many of us who object to Klayman's grandstanding are lawyers or have extensive experience in legal matters, and are well aware of his dishonesty and professional shortcomings. He is an embarrassment to the legal profession and to conservatives. You are just an embarrassment.
325 posted on 11/25/2001 9:44:10 AM PST by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies]

To: JCG
No, I don't have a clue unless you just showed the reason. Would the moderator tell you?

I can't remember reading anything that went against the rules, but being a newbie myself what do I know! ; )

326 posted on 11/25/2001 9:54:41 AM PST by horsewhispersc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: JCG
Anybody know why Rebeckie got banned?
327 posted on 11/25/2001 9:54:45 AM PST by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
Do you know that she was banned?
328 posted on 11/25/2001 9:56:37 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: deport
No current Freeper by that name.

I have my theory and it starts with h(reno lover)!

329 posted on 11/25/2001 10:00:28 AM PST by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
Yes I know that there's no current freeper by that name... But, that's not to say she was banned. It maybe that she requested to be removed and decided to get on with other things. She had expressed dissatisfaction at one point if I remember correctly. Her last post was on the 19th where she just corrected someone about where she was from or lived... None of her last post would indicate banning to me.
330 posted on 11/25/2001 10:07:41 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: deport
Yeah..."move on"---nothing here(treason-murder-Traitors)!
331 posted on 11/25/2001 10:12:45 AM PST by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer
"You are making a fool of yourself."

Good. (my brother is an attorney...so tell me -I see what's going on with you naysayers and you're giving no credit whatsoever to the validity of the Loral case. Shame on you facelift.

332 posted on 11/25/2001 12:49:57 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: JoeEveryman
"Please refrain from using me to bump your threads on Judicial Watch in the future."

Next...

333 posted on 11/25/2001 12:51:55 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
Shame on you facelift.

Whatever that means.

334 posted on 11/25/2001 1:12:11 PM PST by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer
It's short for - short-sightedness caused by being in front of the bench too many hours...
(I know that you're an attorney and I'm surprised that you mountainerr, have given NO CREDIT what-so-ever to the many valid allegations in Klayman's Loral case.
You do know that three govt. agencies voiced their objections to Clinton signing the waivers allowing Loral to conduct business with the PRC...don't you. (you have not commented on this or any of the other devastating evidence in the Loral case/you've taken a stand/and that stand obviously doesn't include the rule of law!)
335 posted on 11/25/2001 1:21:28 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer
I'm awaiting your reply. If it's too long or your having problems with a rebutal-let's head on over to the Loral thread and we can debate there -the many vadid points in this fine case.

EXCELLENT NEWS-LARRY KLAYMAN JUST SAID THAT THE LORAL SHAREHOLDERS CASE - *** HAS BEEN REFILED ***

336 posted on 11/25/2001 1:38:20 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer
In fact, I remember my brother saying - "the Loral case is a brilliant case because it is a shareholders derivative case and etc."
I'll call him now so he can fax me or email me all that he pointed out to me about this case last time we discussed it (which was about a year and half ago).
337 posted on 11/25/2001 1:40:51 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
I have my theory and it starts with h(reno lover)!

329 posted on 11/25/01 11:00 AM Pacific by f.Christian

Funny thing, you didn't mind stating "h" by her full name in your e-mail to me. Gutless, are you? As I told you I agree with "h", and neither of us are "Reno lovers".

So, how about spelling out your "theory"? Never hurts to speak your mind.

338 posted on 11/25/2001 1:42:27 PM PST by katze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
Howlin, yeah, that's our patriotic lady...yeah, so patriotic..! (poor miserable soul/doesn't know what the Rule of Law is if it slammed her in the face!

320 posted on 11/25/01 9:20 AM Pacific by ChaseR

Excuse me, but who in the hell are you to decide who's patriotic and who isn't?

Would you mind posting the cases that Klayman has won? And, do you remember the dismissal attitude Judge Sauls had for Klayman, when he tried to butt into the vote count issue?

Meanwhile, I think you should tone down your rhetoric about just who is and who isn't patriotic. Howlin may allow you to call her her less than patriotic, but I won't. Seems you've had more than your say on this thread, now maybe others would like a turn. I rec'd an e-mail from someone who asked if I defend Howlin (on this thread), and I told him that I do, indeed, defend her. Perhaps you'd like to comment about all the anti-American posts, while you're at it.

339 posted on 11/25/2001 1:54:09 PM PST by katze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
Comprehension problem eh Dog...the Loral Case has just been refiled. (good ole Dog, our oh-so patriotic FR poster who really believes in the Rule of Law...way to shine there Dog boy)

Wow, Chase you're getting riled....now sit down and take a few deep cleansing breaths...or is that Lamaze...LOL

Got to understand, many on these threads have alot of frustration with no results...especially concerning the Clintooons and all their little friends and associates....

So try to understand where they are coming from...Now Relax Chase...OK

340 posted on 11/25/2001 2:08:13 PM PST by KLT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340341-357 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson