Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BUSH JUSTICE DEPARTMENT BLOCKS RENO DEPOSITION
Judicial Watch Press Release ^ | 11/8/01

Posted on 11/08/2001 1:57:39 PM PST by Rebeckie

11/8/2001

202-646-5172

BUSH JUSTICE DEPARTMENT BLOCKS RENO DEPOSITION

Latest Obstruction Prevents Scheduled Testimony In Defamation Case Against Accused Spy Wen Ho Lee

Last Minute Gamesmanship No Better than Clinton Justice Department

(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch, the public interest law firm that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, today criticized the Ashcroft Justice Department for obstructing a long scheduled deposition of former Attorney General Reno in whistleblower Notra Trulock defamation case against accused Chinese spy and admitted felon Wen Ho Lee. Trulock, the former chief of the Energy Department intelligence operations, is suing Lee and others for falsely accusing Trulock of racial bias while conducting an inquiry into the loss of America nuclear secrets from Energy Department labs. Former Attorney General Reno, who was subpoenaed last month, was expected to testify that Wen Ho Lee charges of racial bias had no basis in fact and that there was a legitimate basis to investigate Lee. The deposition of Ms. Reno was scheduled to take place tomorrow in Miami. Judicial Watch is representing Mr. Trulock in this matter.

Late yesterday afternoon, the Ashcroft Justice Department, through a fax from Assistant Attorney General Robert D. McCallum, Jr., unilaterally decided that Reno (and other witnesses such as former FBI Director Louis Freeh) would not appear as scheduled. Judicial Watch was told by a Justice Department lawyer that this decision was only made yesterday. (The Ashcroft Justice Department had known that Reno would be testifying in this case since June of this year.)

The Justice Department lawyers know they have no legal basis to prevent Ms. Reno from testifying at the last minute. Yet they think they are above the law and are contemptuous of the Court processes. The Ashcroft Justice Department has continually obstructed this case. Indeed, a federal court has already sanctioned them for similar conduct in this case. "Truth be told, in matters that Judicial Watch has been litigating, the ethics and practices of the Ashcroft Justice Department are no better than those of Reno Justice Department", stated Judicial Watch Chairman Larry Klayman.

"No one is above the law. And Judicial Watch will seek appropriate sanctions and plans to ask for an independent investigation by the Office of Professional Responsibility into the way the Wen Ho Lee case has been handled. These repeated obstructionist tactics by this Justice Department are most likely to cover up their ongoing negligence concerning the loss of virtually all of our nation nuclear secrets to China and other nations adverse to the United States", added Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340341-357 next last
To: Rebeckie
Bush is just fortunate that so far the Demoncraps have no viable candidate to run against him in 2004. It prolly will still be a very close election, due to the Demonrats cheating, and the *&@*!@##* union workers always voting straight Dims. ticket.
301 posted on 11/25/2001 7:22:49 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
"These repeated obstructionist tactics by this Justice Department are most likely to cover up their ongoing negligence concerning the loss of virtually all of our nation nuclear secrets to China and other nations adverse to the United States"

No matter how you dress it up, he STILL raised over 30 million dollars and only spent two million on legal expenses. If you can't figure out what's happening to the rest of the money, you shouldn't be on here telling us all about this LEGAL CASE.

But Larry's counting on you. Keep on sending those fives and tens.

302 posted on 11/25/2001 7:28:43 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
It's like dealing with cult members!
303 posted on 11/25/2001 7:31:39 AM PST by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
Do you really think we're all too dumb to know that ANYBODY can refile anything? This means nothing. All it means is that one of Larry's people took a bunch of papers down there to the Clerk of Court and gave them back to her -- after he corrected the errors he made last time, I'm sure.

This doesn't mean it will even leave her office!

304 posted on 11/25/2001 7:32:47 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
Excuse me???

IMHO Klayman is a joke...

Next time please dont ping me to a old Klayman thread and attack me...

305 posted on 11/25/2001 7:40:44 AM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Howlin continues to show that patriotic ladys face of hers:
"You really are pathetic. I've never seen ONE court case Larry Klayman won"

"Judicial Watch has brought a class action derivative suit on behalf of the policyholders of State Farm Insurance Company against
State Farm and its top executives for improperly paying Bill Clinton's legal fees and expenses. Clinton pressured State Farm Insurance to pay
his legal expenses in Paula Jones' lawsuit despite the fact that insurance policies do not generally cover intentional conduct of defendants,
such as Ms. Jones' alleged sexual harassment and libel related claims."
82 posted on 11/24/01 7:30 PM Pacific by JCG

*****
Poor Howlin & her short-memory problem...(Howlin, looks like Klayman won this one, eh)

306 posted on 11/25/2001 7:44:46 AM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
Where does it say he won that one?
307 posted on 11/25/2001 7:48:16 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies]

To: Dog; KLT
"to a old Klayman thread"

Comprehension problem eh Dog...the Loral Case has just been refiled. (good ole Dog, our oh-so patriotic FR poster who really believes in the Rule of Law...way to shine there Dog boy)

308 posted on 11/25/2001 7:49:02 AM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Oh come now, where have you been???
309 posted on 11/25/2001 7:50:23 AM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Now you tell all of Mr patriotic Dog, what you see wrong here:

"No one is above the law. And Judicial Watch will seek appropriate sanctions and plans to ask for
an independent investigation by the Office of Professional Responsibility into the way the Wen Ho Lee case has been handled."

310 posted on 11/25/2001 8:00:52 AM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: Rebeckie
Move along nothing to see here. Bush really is serious about exposing government corruption.
311 posted on 11/25/2001 8:02:37 AM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Being in legal myself, Howlin is right. Depos do get cancelled all of the time and the lawyers are famous for another thing and that is bringing motions before the court say on December 23rd just so we can cancel our holiday plans. Usually, it doesn't happen, though; but the opposing side doesn't know that until the 11th hour.

Anyway,what we should be more concerned with is the propoganda that the so called left is spewing. I was thinking, for example, about all of the money, time, books, tv, movies, press, etc. that have been spent on the horrors of abuse of women such as rape. (They have atleast one movie a week dealing with this subject). But it's alright to have an alleged rapist as President of the United States. Kind of makes you sick, doesn't it?

312 posted on 11/25/2001 8:04:23 AM PST by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Thank you, Howlin....
313 posted on 11/25/2001 8:07:54 AM PST by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Maybe ol' larr will get some more action this time... A search of the web site doesn't bring up any announcements of a refiling and the last press release is in 9/2000 talking about the ruling and they will appeal and refile in state courts.... If there had been a refiling I'd think ol' larr would have it plasted on his web site. Maybe he did and it will keep the Clintons busy a while longer.


Your Search Item: loral
Press Releases
(24 Matching Results Found)
145 Cox: "Chinagate will have to wait"
140 Sandy Berger sued over Chinagate
86 JOHN HUANG ASSERTS FIFTH AMENDMENT ON MANY ISSUES
542 Judicial Watch Lawsuit Against Loral/Clinton Administration May Be Only Hope for Justice
205 CORRUPTION LARGELY UNADDRESSED BY PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES
162 CLINTON AVOIDS PANAMA CANAL HANDOVER CEREMONIES - A GUILTY CONSCIENCE AT WORK?
292 WE TOLD YOU SO!
578 JUDICIAL WATCH TO REFILE CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS IN LORAL/CHINAGATE LAWSUIT
46 HILLARY CLINTON IS DEFENDANT IN TWO JUDICIAL WATCH LAWSUITS
59 CHINAGATE IS BACK
155 CHINAGATE BONANZA ON FOX NEWS TONIGHT!
1164 The Edge with Paula Zahn: Dick Morris, Peter Fenn and John Fund Criticize
60 Gore Deeply Involved in Chinagate
305 Election Returns Show Political And Media Establishment Can't Ignore Political Corruption
396 TOM DELAY "COPY-CAT" CASE NOT THE REAL THING
388 RENO COVERS-UP AGAIN
397 JUDICIAL WATCH RICO CASE CONCERNING LORAL, THE CLINTONS, GORE, AND THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT THAN CASE AGAINST TOM DELAY
88 JUDICIAL WATCH TO DEPOSE EX-COMMERCE OFFICIAL JUDE KEARNEY IN CHINAGATE CASE ON APRIL 20, 1999
193 JUDICIAL WATCH SERVES DEMAND LETTER ON GERMAN AND U.S. BANKS FINANCING THE CLINTONS' MANSION
360 CHARLIE TRIE RECOMMENDED FOR CONTEMPT IN JUDICIAL WATCH CASE
89 FORMER TOP COMMERCE LAWYER FORCED TO ADMIT SELLING SEATS ON COMMERCE TRADE MISSIONS WOULD BE ILLEGAL
399 LOUISIANA GOVERNOR EDWIN EDWARDS CONVICTED OF RACKETEERING FOR TAKING POLITICAL BRIBES
103 GORE HIRES INFLUENCE PEDDLER
213 CLINTON JUSTICE DEPARTMENT INDICTS MCDONNELL DOUGLAS FOR ALLEGED CHINAGATE EXPORT VIOLATIONS BUT FAILS TO INDICT LORAL AND SCHWARTZ
Court Documents
(4 Matching Results Found)
PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT TERRENCE R. MCAULIFFE'S MOTION TO DISMISS Judicial Watch's motion stating that the plaintiffs do not allege that McAuliffe participated in the operation or management of Loral. They do allege that McAuliffe conspired with others, including Loral Chairman and CEO Bernard L. Schwartz.
COMPLAINT This is a shareholder derivative action brought pursuant to Rule 23.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for recovery by and on behalf of Loral Space and Communications, Ltd...
PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT MARVIN ROSEN'S MOTION TO DISMISS "The Plaintiffs' conspiracy claim is that Defendants, including Rosen, agreed to participate in this unlawful bribery scheme, and that Schwartz committed repeated, overt tortious acts in furtherance of the scheme by making payments in excess of $1,460,000, to the DNC and other organizations affiliated with the Democrats and the Democratic Party in exchange for taxpayer-financed government services and other favorable treatment for Loral."
Sandy Berger sued over Chinagate Berger added to list of defendants in Loral/Chinagate suit. Read amended complaint here.


Return to JW Home
 
 
 


info@judicialwatch.org • 1-888-JW-ETHIC
© 2001, Judicial Watch, Inc., ® All rights reserved.
Technology by Gen-X Strategies
Site Maintenance by Cory Consulting
     
 


314 posted on 11/25/2001 8:09:17 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: JoeEveryman
Come visit this thread and give us your patriotic comments:

EXCELLENT NEWS-LARRY KLAYMAN JUST SAID THAT THE LORAL SHAREHOLDERS CASE - *** HAS BEEN REFILED ***

315 posted on 11/25/2001 8:09:31 AM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
Howlin, my last post is in reference to your post "59". You are correct.
316 posted on 11/25/2001 8:10:11 AM PST by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: deport
Yeah, you can come to Mr patriotic deport...
317 posted on 11/25/2001 8:11:29 AM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: deport
Ot o...typo, looks like deport gets another invitation:
"Yeah, you can come too Mr patriotic deport..."
318 posted on 11/25/2001 8:12:45 AM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
"Do NOT lecture me; especially about things you know nothing about."

Now that's a good one. And it came from someone -who is absolutely dense/dumb/blind to justice.. herself! Please!!

319 posted on 11/25/2001 8:17:37 AM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Howlin, yeah, that's our patriotic lady...yeah, so patriotic..! (poor miserable soul/doesn't know what the Rule of Law is if it slammed her in the face!
320 posted on 11/25/2001 8:20:31 AM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340341-357 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson