To: onyx
No wiretap needed -- just a radio. The fact a call was made is easy to discern, call log/phone bill, whatever. The fact that they called each other "cousin" during the call; I wonder if that is literary license or known fact.
11 posted on
11/03/2001 3:42:07 PM PST by
Cboldt
To: Cboldt
I KNOW that call was not monitored by wiretap. My hurray for roving wiretaps relates to the new law, which, had Atta been a suspect at the time of the hi-jacking, the roving wiretap would have given the authorities the wherewithall to stop the flight from taking off. Sheeesh.
16 posted on
11/03/2001 5:49:30 PM PST by
onyx
To: Cboldt
"The fact that they called each other 'cousin' during the call..." Read the passage in the article again:
"The call rang aboard another sparsely occupied jetliner a bit farther back on the same tarmac, on a cellphone belonging to Marwan al- Shehhi, in seat 6C on United Airlines Flight 175. The conversation between the two men, so close that they called each other cousin, lasted less than one minute just long enough, investigators say, to signal that the plot was on."
Now - MY question is - did UAL 175 take off that day? Or was it amongst The Grounded? And where was UAL 175 departing to?
Michael
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson