Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: onyx
No wiretap needed -- just a radio. The fact a call was made is easy to discern, call log/phone bill, whatever. The fact that they called each other "cousin" during the call; I wonder if that is literary license or known fact.
11 posted on 11/03/2001 3:42:07 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt
I KNOW that call was not monitored by wiretap. My hurray for roving wiretaps relates to the new law, which, had Atta been a suspect at the time of the hi-jacking, the roving wiretap would have given the authorities the wherewithall to stop the flight from taking off. Sheeesh.
16 posted on 11/03/2001 5:49:30 PM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Cboldt
"The fact that they called each other 'cousin' during the call..."

Read the passage in the article again:

"The call rang aboard another sparsely occupied jetliner a bit farther back on the same tarmac, on a cellphone belonging to Marwan al- Shehhi, in seat 6C on United Airlines Flight 175. The conversation between the two men, so close that they called each other cousin, lasted less than one minute — just long enough, investigators say, to signal that the plot was on."

Now - MY question is - did UAL 175 take off that day? Or was it amongst The Grounded? And where was UAL 175 departing to?

Michael

22 posted on 11/07/2001 8:16:59 AM PST by Wright is right!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson