To: Don Myers
You think your "UAIFs" have the bomb, but do they have a delivery system? Paranoia is such a wonderful condition. I meant Israel's nuclear weapons, read #15. UAIF's only voiced an opinion that Israel would be justified to nuke just about any country, not limited to their attackers, if they were to go down, and that that is a valid blackmail weapon to use to make America and Europe not to "abandon" their "ally".
To: madrussian
"UAIF's only voiced an opinion that Israel would be justified to nuke just about any country, not limited to their attackers, if they were to go down, and that that is a valid blackmail weapon to use to make America and Europe not to "abandon" their "ally"."
Interesting. Just who are the UAIFs, and can you show anything in which these people did that?
To: madrussian
Israel would be justified to nuke just about any country, not limited to their attackers I'm not sure what you are referring to, but how is this different from us attacking the Taliban in Afghanistan? The Taliban didn't attack us, but they supported ouor attackers, so we attacked the Taliban.
To: madrussian
ICBM Jericho 111! Intercontinental it is. How does that reach you? Aggressive little critters, aren't they?
To: madrussian
They don't need to blackmail anyone. If the Arabs attack Israel and drive it to the brink of destruction, unleashing these weapons on the Arab states would destabilize the region and probaly render useless 40% of the world's known oil supplies. That is enough of a reason for the west to try to bring peace to the region. It's not blackmail, it's just a practical geopolitical reality.
The Arabs should make peace with Israel. There is no reason for them to continue their hateful rhetoric, especially considering the west's support for a Palestinian state. It's time for the Arab states to step forward and offer a quid pro quo.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson