To: summer
What dan909 endorses is fine, but it's not the same as the generally accepted definition of pacifism. Webster's says pacifism is "opposition to war or violence as a means of settling disputes, esp. on moral or religious grounds." This means a pacifist does not believe we should be settling our dispute with the Taliban with military force, under any circumstance. Those who believe in righteous self-defense may be justified, but they are not pacifists.
60 posted on
11/01/2001 9:53:47 AM PST by
dwbh
To: dwbh; dan909
dan909, Perhaps you would like to publicly respond to dwbh's post #60. Sincerely, summer :)
62 posted on
11/01/2001 9:55:43 AM PST by
summer
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson