Skip to comments.
12,000-Year-Old Human Hair DNA
Earth Files ^
| 10-30-2001
| Linda Moulton Howe
Posted on 10/30/2001 10:13:42 AM PST by blam
Please click on the site to view this article. They have some pretty serious sounding, 'Don't reproduce' verbage on that page. Thanks.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
DNA does not match any humans alive today. (Now, I wonder if it matches the human DNA from Australian that claims the same) The original Americans are now extinct?
1
posted on
10/30/2001 10:13:42 AM PST
by
blam
To: RightWhale; sawsalimb; SurferDoc; Bernard Marx; VadeRetro
FYI.
2
posted on
10/30/2001 10:14:59 AM PST
by
blam
To: blam
It is not clear from reading the article how the investigators ever got the notion that these were "human" hairs in the first place.
3
posted on
10/30/2001 10:16:36 AM PST
by
error99
To: error99
Professor Orr has even considered the possibility that the black hairs could come from a hominoid such as the mysterious Sasquatch long associated with the northwest. Ohhhhhhkay. I thought bigfoot was a brunette?
4
posted on
10/30/2001 10:18:21 AM PST
by
Ratatoskr
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: blam; *crevo_list; longshadow; PatrickHenry
Interesting, but it might only mean that some human subgroups have gone extinct or diffused into much larger populations. I'd be surprised if that had never occurred.
6
posted on
10/30/2001 10:22:59 AM PST
by
VadeRetro
To: error99
"You can identify human hair, forensic criminologist types, can identify human hair from a single strand because of the granules and color and all that kind of stuff. You can distinguish human hair from all other hair just from a little piece of follicle."Doesn't sound overwhelmingly scientific, huh? "Stuff?"
7
posted on
10/30/2001 10:23:55 AM PST
by
blam
To: error99
From an isolated population that died out. They don't say how exactly how different it is from humans that exist today.
8
posted on
10/30/2001 10:25:29 AM PST
by
ARCADIA
To: JudyB1938
Bump.
9
posted on
10/30/2001 10:27:26 AM PST
by
blam
To: blam
Don't get excited, I heard the same thing about OJ's hair samples...
To: blam
Doesn't sound overwhelmingly scientific, huh? "Stuff?"Stuff - it's not a scientific term. Stuff is a technical term. Everybody knows that.
11
posted on
10/30/2001 10:32:53 AM PST
by
LTCJ
To: blam
Yet more possible evidence that the "Native Americans" are carpet baggers just like the Europeans. People need to be very careful before they start playing "We were here first!" games.
To: blam
IT'S ALMOST AS IF THEY WERE QUICK FROZEN That's a Linda Moulton Howe quote of Dr Orr. That ties in with the quick-frozen animals in interior Alaska as far as the time scale. It has something to do with the last ice-age, almost as if the earth tipped on its axis and dumped whole geographic regions into arctic cold momentarily.
LMH has a good reputation as a reporter of Fortean-type events.
To: blam
I don't know if it is junk science here or not. But the fact that the
first "amercians" were killed off or simply replaced by later arrivals. Just as most of what are "Europeans" today were not "native" to their lands several thousands of years ago. This is natural, population migrations must have happened all the time with the local populations getting replaced in the process.
But if the scientist are right and we are all came out of Africa, we here is the US are all "African-Americans". I call those with with dark skin "Americans of recent African decent". ;^)
14
posted on
10/30/2001 10:37:04 AM PST
by
machman
To: rolling_stone
it's bigfoot.
15
posted on
10/30/2001 10:38:36 AM PST
by
stumpy
To: VadeRetro
From the article:
We found several strands of human hair, long pieces a foot and a half long, black, long pieces of hair.
According to persistent rumors, what they found seems to match Hillary's pubes.
To: blam
Very interesting. This could mean that the Paleo-Indians are off the hook for causing the extinction of the paleo-horses and other paleo-megafauna.
Is the Woodburn longhaired man/woman/sasquatch any relation to Kennewick Man? The Clintonistas did their best to see to it that Kennewick Man would be buried away and lost to science, but I think the bones are still in someone's safekeeping.
To: PatrickHenry
According to persistent rumors, what they found seems to match Hillary's pubes In the future, could you please hold all such posts like this until well after dinner time? The mere thought of Her Royal Arrogance's nether region is enough to ruin any meal.
To: ARCADIA; blam
Good point. I'd be interested in knowing just how much divergence there is,and how much divergence(or whatever the term is)is normal. I don't know enough about DNA analysis to talk intelligently about it: can anyone point me at some place that gives some basic overviews of the subject?
To: blam
OK, I realize this will probably sound like a stupid question to you science mavens out there, but here goes: If the hair does not match any known human DNA, what makes them think it's human?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson