Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NautiNurse
I always wonder why people argue with an attempt at intimidation, they typically write: "You Joe aren't worthy of responding to, so I will get off my high horse and dirty myself with a reply." Isn't that juvenile?

I don't remember me frantically shrieking(seems like someone who replies in all caps is rather hysterical), I said that it seems rather odd to assume a pattern from the attack on 911. Why assume that it is some domestic right wing whacko? Why not Al-Qeda? What pattern has been established? None. I think they are capable of a whole host of evils. If that is hysterical, I think I would rather elect to be hysterical than deliberately foolish.

And even in your message, why are you assuming that right wing whackos are producing this 'diversion'? Al-Qeda is somehow incapable?

53 posted on 10/28/2001 3:35:20 PM PST by rebdov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: rebdov
(seems like someone who replies in all caps is rather hysterical) WHAT PATTERN DOES AL-QEDA HAVE?

Again, that group has a history of bombings. That is a pattern. Period. If you choose to make additional inferences and assumptions about anything beyond that, then you aren't paying attention. Enough said.

56 posted on 10/28/2001 3:52:48 PM PST by NautiNurse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson