Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vbmoneyspender; JohnHuang2; ken21; Jaded; Vinomori
"Why is Fleischer doing backflips in order to deny obvious Iraqi involvement?" He doesn't want to deny the obvious, he wants to delay it, at the President's instruction.

We have to delay...

The Showdown with Sadaam.

How do we know it's delay and not deny?

Because we keep hearing from President Bush and Secretary Rumsfeld that this war is going to last years. I don't think so... not in the Afghanistan Campaign it isn't.

So there's more. Recall the deal we just cut with Iran, allowing for our pilots to crash-land in their territory, and they would do humanitarian rescue. Between the lines, that means we're getting use of their airspace, since only if a pilot is shot down there would anyone know we were there. This gives Iran a built-in out against the radicals if this should happen,

Why are we doing this with them? Not for Afghanistan. This is for Iraq, whom Iran hates. Remember that during the Gulf War in '90-'91, Bush the Elder neglected to bring Iran into the coalition, and Sadaam pulled off a deal to stash the bulk of his air force in Iran just prior to Desert Storm. Dubya isn't repeating that mistake, and Iran recognizes that a bio, chem ,and possibly nuke-capable Sadaam isn't in their long-term or short term best interests.

So why delay, and not strike?

In addition to the logistics abroad, consider:

We're under bio-attack. A biological WMD has been used against us, on American soil, for the first time in our History. In world History.

And these aren't really attacks. They're advertisements. We know Sadaam has more than anthrax letters in his arsenal. He has better anthrax with better delivery systems, smallpox, VX gas, and no one in our government can say for sure that he doesn't have nukes. He's letting us know that his arsenal is already here. We need time to stop what's brewing here, because it isn't pretty.

9/11 wasn't his best shot. He's got a knife to our throat. That's why we're being goaded into this war.

Sadaam Hussein is holding cards that we don't want him to play, so we try to crack as many of the sleeper terrorists as possible before striking Iraq.

That's why we're delaying....

Momentarily.

10 posted on 10/26/2001 10:24:33 PM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Sabertooth
If your analysis is correct, don't you think it is beyond despicable to leak that right wing groups might be involved with this. Also, do you really think it is wise for our leaders to try and 'protect' us from the truth?
11 posted on 10/26/2001 10:40:25 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Sabertooth
Our military was so wiped-out and politically cleansed during the eight years of Clinton, that we are unable to launch a full-out war on two fronts without the use of nukes.

The WH will wait for the results from ALL lab tests, and likely not announce the findings to the press. Let the speculations roll. Plenty of time to wage war, and when we do, it must be a "big-time" surprise..... (without media in the loop).

Iraq must be lulled into thinking that they're 'off-the-hook.'

16 posted on 10/26/2001 11:04:47 PM PDT by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson