Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists alarmed by low levels of scientific awareness (China)
SCMP ^ | October 24, 2001 | JAMILA ZHOU

Posted on 10/24/2001 10:15:32 AM PDT by super175

When the China Association for Science and Technology, a semi-official organisation, did a survey of 8,500 Chinese, it discovered to its alarm that only 14 out of 1,000 of them knew the answers to some very basic scientific questions. Things like whether the sun rotates around the earth or the earth around the sun, whether the continents we live on float, and so forth.

The questionnaire was given to Chinese between the ages of 18 and 69, but did not include residents of Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan. It consisted of 32 questions about basic scientific ideas. A score of 20 or more correct answers meant that the person had a basic understanding of scientific concepts.

Unfortunately, the survey revealed that only 1.4 per cent of those surveyed could answer more than 20 of the questions. That was 1.2 percentage points higher than the 1996 figure, but well behind the figures for developed countries, the Association says. In the US, the figure was 5 per cent in 1985 and 7 per cent in 1990.

China is not a great deal different from many other countries where an interest in science is more popular or more cultivated among males. In China this is also true for cities, the eastern seaboard, and among better-educated citizens.

Some people think this is the cause of the imbalance in national development. The figures for men who have made a name in the fields of science are almost double those for women. Similar figures for cities and scientific development are eight times those for rural areas, and for the east coast, the figure is four times that of the western part of the country.

Students are 300 times more likely to understand basic scientific concepts than are farmers, while college graduates are at least 100 times more likely to than are people with a primary school education or less.

If basic knowledge of science is broken down by occupation, students rank highest, followed in descending order by professionals, business people, clerks and the heads of state institutions, Party, or mass organisations.

The survey showed that most Chinese get their ideas about science from the mass media. More than 82 per cent said they mainly learned about science and technology from the television. More than 52 per cent of the people said they got some ideas from newspapers and magazines. Only 1.6 per cent read about science on the Internet.

People do not seem in the least bit fazed by all this. The survey revealed that they did not show much enthusiasm for science and technology over the past year. Nearly 86 per cent had not visited any science and technology museums or natural history museums. More than 81 per cent had not attended any science and technology exhibitions and 73 per cent had not been to any public libraries or reading rooms. More than 68 per cent of them had not even visited a zoo or botanical garden in the past year.

The association was terse and the assessment bleak: the Chinese urgently need to increase their basic knowledge of science.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Believe it or not, this underscores a whole lot of our problems with China.

The answers about economics I would venture to say have an even lower score...

China is operating in its own little world.

1 posted on 10/24/2001 10:15:32 AM PDT by super175
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: juval
Many Chinese are prone to have a hook line and sinker acceptance of the Party line.

Many are angry at America only because they are ignorant to what America is all about. That is just the way the CCP likes it.

2 posted on 10/24/2001 10:17:26 AM PDT by super175
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: super175
I'm still trying to figure out how cold, dispassionate, value-free empirical "science" proves dat de oppressed pipples should, de 'ow you say, rise up against deir oppressors and make de, 'ow you say, de rewolution.

Which great scientist "proved" that oppression is "morally wrong?" Was it Galileo, Newton, or Darwin? Or perhaps some chemist somewhere conducted a controlled experiment in a test tube (complete with a test sample) that proves "scientifically" that what the Left is against is "morally wrong." Seeing how the Left bases its entire worldview on hard, unsentimental, objective empirical science.

3 posted on 10/24/2001 10:22:00 AM PDT by Zionist Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: super175
Unfortunately, the survey revealed that only 1.4 per cent of those surveyed could answer more than 20 of the questions. That was 1.2 percentage points higher than the 1996 figure, but well behind the figures for developed countries, the Association says. In the US, the figure was 5 per cent in 1985 and 7 per cent in 1990.

Wow, this whole article was about China, but look at the American scores...not much better. This is sad.
5 posted on 10/24/2001 10:26:17 AM PDT by Whittlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: super175
Does anyone have a link to the test questions?
6 posted on 10/24/2001 10:55:30 AM PDT by GunsareOK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: super175
Hey, at least most of them beleive the Earth is more than 6,000 years old, and they have the human artifacts to prove it.
7 posted on 10/24/2001 10:59:08 AM PDT by Wm Bach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GunsareOK
I wonder how people on the streets of L.A. would fare.
8 posted on 10/24/2001 10:59:12 AM PDT by advocate10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: super175
If only 10% of Chinese are well educated, that is still 100 million people. Maybe they want the masses to be ignorant, just like the elite in America want the masses to be ignorant sheeple.
9 posted on 10/24/2001 11:17:37 AM PDT by OK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: decarlo
http://www.tibet.ca/wtnarchive/1994/4/15-2_3.html
11 posted on 10/25/2001 4:22:25 AM PDT by Wm Bach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Northman
We believe that the universe was brought into existence by God, who is eternal (outside time), whose essence is being itself, and who sustains the universe in its existence.

We don't believe that the universe caused itself, and therefore preceded itself.

12 posted on 10/25/2001 4:28:03 AM PDT by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: super175
Answers to an economics quiz in any 'capitalist' country would make an intelligent man weep.
13 posted on 10/25/2001 4:30:34 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: juval
I have studied China a lot longer than 3 years. Much longer.

China is full of a bunch of juvinile fools. China is prone to instablility and war. China could be at war within 30 minutes. They have missiles pointed all over the place, particularly at Taiwan. Only China would be stupid enough to carry through with starting the next world war.

I am in no way jealous of China's economy. #1 because America BUILT China's economy. Trade never hurt a soul. However China has this juvinile and uneducated picture of the way the world ought to be and are willing to enforce their picture of things with nuclear missiles.

You are still in this ignorant state of thinking. America does not need China. If China cut us off tommorrow in the short term it would cause a headache because we would have to move all our manufacturing to somewhere else. A year or two down the road though there will be little long term economic damage done to the US.

You are vastly overstating what China does and how it works and what value it portrays. True it is somewhat mutually beneficial, but then again if China keeps it up we can find what we need in a partnership somewhere else then China is left out of the loop.

If Chinese people want to do business thats fine, just remember though that there ain't no one who is irreplaceable, and that includes China.

If you think these big corporations are being floated by the Chinese market you have another thing coming. What China offers is very low cost labor to highly labor intensive manufacturing companies. Keep in mind though that there are poor people elsewhere that are just as willing to work.

You are walking around thinking America owes China something or that you guys are way better than you really are. You think the world cannot go on without you.

16 posted on 11/01/2001 5:24:42 AM PST by super175
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: super175
They should survey the American liberals. That would definately make them feel better.
17 posted on 11/01/2001 5:51:55 AM PST by hsszionist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson