Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: occam's chainsaw
There was one thing I have to agree with the author on.."The Clinton's are BIG, FAT, targets"..

Yes, they are.

sw

8 posted on 10/23/2001 4:47:20 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: spectre
"The Clinton's are BIG, FAT, targets"

and their constant posturing in front of any and all available cameras only reinforces that impression! For those of us outside New York, can any current resident give us a comparison of the appearance counts of Hillary and Chuck (Schumer)? From out here in the hinterlands / flyover country, she has had more appearances by far and that is my basis for considering her to be a camera hog.

43 posted on 10/23/2001 5:06:57 PM PDT by SES1066
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: spectre
; or rather, the Clintons tend to bring out anti-intellectualism.

This is a planted article, no doubt. Remember when Hillary said you could "tell the class of people by looking at their teeth?"

But if disliking the Clintons is a sign of anti-intellectualism, I'm glad we're dumb.

But I'm smart enough to see a fraud when I see/hear one.

101 posted on 10/23/2001 7:00:25 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson