Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/21/2001 9:26:22 PM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: JMJ333
Ping.
2 posted on 10/21/2001 9:55:07 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gcruse
WASHINGTON -- Veteran reporters and creaking commentators have a single goal in writing about great events: advance the story. Unearth facts that policy makers do not know, do not want to know, or do not want the public to know they know.

In case Safire hasn't noticed, the NY Times slept through most of the "great" events during the Clinton administration.

For years, U.S. officials kept mum about the duplicity of Saudi Arabia in financing anti-U.S. incitement while professing to be a U.S. ally. But because The New Yorker's Seymour Hersh, the oldest investigative reporter alive, held his ear trumpet to our ultra-secret Big Ear,

The NY Times has an ultra-secret big ear! LOL [sorry]

we now have telephone intercepts between Prince Bandar, the Saudi ambassador to Washington, and his father, the defense minister. The Saudis never have been on our side in the war on terror — which our leaders have long known but most Americans did not.

I don't believe for a second that the NY Times is just now finding out that the Saudi's aren't on our side in the war on terror. They only report what they want to report, when its convenient to them.

That wearing of blinders by our intelligence agents was recently revealed by The Washington Post's columnist and editor Jim Hoagland, who is dry behind the ears, to say the least.

First super-secret ears, now dry behind the ears...

"One war at a time" goes the coalitionaries' mantra, which our spymasters take to mean "Don't follow leads to Iraq." Journageezers ignore such government manipulation. Nobody has come close to my Times colleagues in covering the cataclysm and the war it triggered, but it would be good to see a new wave of reporters beat the old media bigfeet in advancing this story.

Iraq may be next in line for the bombing, but will we have the guts to take out Saddam? Want to wager??

5 posted on 10/21/2001 10:22:03 PM PDT by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wallaby; golitely; Nancie Drew; BlueDogDemo; aristeides; kattracks; honway; JohnHuang2...
BTTT
6 posted on 10/21/2001 10:27:14 PM PDT by OKCSubmariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
BUMP
12 posted on 10/22/2001 4:53:48 AM PDT by vrwc54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
"One war at a time" goes the coalitionaries' mantra, which our spymasters take to mean "Don't follow leads to Iraq."

This is taking "connect the dots" to an extreme. I have seen no evidence that the Bush W Administration is trying to dodge the bullet on possible Iraq involvement. On the contrary, Bush the Elder is very likely to argue in the opposite direction. Having messed it up himself due to pressure from the Saudis and others, the elder Bush should be very pleased to have the opportunity to watch his son finish the job that he started. And I believe that W is listening.

15 posted on 10/22/2001 5:19:32 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
bttt
16 posted on 10/22/2001 9:51:07 AM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
WILLIAM SAFIRE and his buddies have been pounding the take out Saddam drum since Sept 11. He has all the facts you know and it didn't matter that all the allies in the Irag war said that if we took out Saddam they wouldn't be part of it. Bush I had to promise all the Arabs that Saddam wasn't the goal and Safire never makes this point in any of his rants !
18 posted on 10/22/2001 10:00:32 AM PDT by america-rules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson