Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: isom35
No doubt. Studying rejected ballots to try to interpret what the vote really was is an exercise in stupidity and futility.

By the way, I really love how the article says that the people who "discovered" that Gore should have won are saying that they won't release the info because of the war out of the goodness of their hearts. They're actually doing the smart thing here. If this story was widely disseminated, it would be shot down pretty quick. What they are doing is subtly planting seeds of doubt for use later.

36 posted on 10/21/2001 6:35:41 PM PDT by Hillary 666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Hillary 666
"I really love how the article says that the people who "discovered" that Gore should have won are saying that they won't release the info because of the war out of the goodness of their hearts. They're actually doing the smart thing here."

Exactly. They're deliberately planting this so that people will think, "Whoa-- Gore must've won after all, and by a big enough margin to really embarrass Bush! But these people are so magnanimous, so bending over backwards to be fair, that they are not releasing the information. How big of them!"

Yeeccch...will these Gorons stop at nothing?

62 posted on 10/21/2001 8:05:13 PM PDT by Nea Wood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson