I excerpt this as a typical example of the kind of lying right-wingers do these days as a matter of lifestyle.
No one will ever prove the above charge, and I will bet a thousand dollars that it isn't true. It's just more lies from the wing-nut faction in yet another attempt to blame Clinton for something he didn't do.
At no point in this article did this Waller (in mud?) guy make any connection between Clinton and the "sensitivity training" he is complaining about. But that doesn't stop him from blaming Clinton anyway.
If a right-winger were writing a headline for a volcano eruption, he would probably work Clinton into it somehow. Then, months later, we'd find out that no volcano had actually erupted in the first place -- that the eruption had been "imagined" by someone from a slime sheet like INSIGHT as a new way to falsely accuse Clinton of something.
As aggressive and unscrupulous as they are, right-wingers would be even more dangerous to liberty and freedom if anything they said ever turned out to actually be true.
And as anyone who has read of the actions of liberals at many universities or "People's Republics" like Massachusetts and California can attest, the threat to tolerance and liberty in America comes from the left side of the spectrum. They believe in tolerance only if they can tolerate your views; otherwise, to the concentration camp, er, sensitivity training you go!