Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dandelion
Hey, cidofovir looks promising for sure. However, it may not work. The FDA has approved its use for the treatment of CMV retinitis, NOT SMALLPOX. So the FDA believes it is relatively safe, under certain clinical conditions, and relatively effective, under certain clinical conditions, for the treatment of CMV retinitis. It will be VERY VERY DIFFICULT to work out if it's effective against smallpox, because (thankfully) no-one has the disease -- so there's no population on which to test it. Animal models are suggestive but far from conclusive -- plenty of drugs don't get through phase III trials (the big efficacy trials that do double-blinded tests on a big population). So a hint of caution may be in order.
18 posted on 10/19/2001 2:30:00 AM PDT by slhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: slhill
Definitely caution - this would NOT be something one would want to do as a "precautionary measure". However, according to the Emedicine link " Cidofovir (Vistide)- A nucleoside analog DNA polymerase inhibitor; if administered within 48 h of exposure, may attenuate or avoid infection; adefovir, cidofovir, and ribavirin are under investigation for smallpox".

Since we have nothing better, and those who have been studying it have come up with suggested doses, it begs the question - will we be given the option to try cidofovir, considering that it's risks are - by all accounts - significantly lower than that of smallpox?

19 posted on 10/19/2001 2:38:36 AM PDT by dandelion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson