[MosesKnows]

A bump for truth is noble, if it is indeed truth.

Consider these contradictary statements in the article;
First, Palestine has never existed -- before or since -- as an autonomous entity.
Second, It was ruled alternately by...

How does one state on one hand that something never existed and then state "it" was ruled. What is the "it" referring to? Could it be something that never existed?

[Anamensis]

How does one state on one hand that something never existed and then state "it" was ruled.

It says "it never existed AS AN AUTONOMOUS ENTITY."

[BoomerBob]

you're leaving out the complete phrase:

"...existed as an autonomous entity"

the article then explains why it was never autonomous. No contradiction.

[Sabramerican]

Unless my eyes are playing tricks on me, I see seven words following "never existed" explaining the author's correct recitation of history.

I don't see a contradiction. Again, maybe it's my tricky eyes....or it's your infirmity.

[woollyone]

"...contradictary (spelling contradiction!) statements in the article..."

That's the best you could come up with? Well, how about you go over there and explain to them what the real story is after your and thoughtful, thoroughly vacuous examination of the issues.

"MosesKnows"...please, tells us all what that means! Let me guess...Moses knows that the Jews should be driven into the Sea. Is that what you're gonna say right?