To: ironman; JohnHuang2; Hoboken; Brian_Baldwin; slimer; tracer
For everyone who's posted
in response to my questions at #44 on this thread:
We really need to get a handle on our terms here.
What does "tested positive for exposure" mean?
Do they have anthrax, or just the antibodies?
First, thanks for your input. However...
I'd actually already answered my own questions at #60. There's a new feature on FR, "View Replies." It works quite well, and using it before posting will prevent unnecessary or repetitive posts. Not that you all didn't provide additional useful information, but if you'd been aware that the question was already answered, we could have cut to the chase more quickly on the other stuff.
Use"View Replies"
It Works!
Thanks,
Sabertooth
To: Sabertooth
Thanks, I never knew that was there. Honest.
160 posted on
10/17/2001 9:19:07 AM PDT by
riri
To: Sabertooth
cool, "view replies" - just tried it . . .
To: Sabertooth
We really need to get a handle on our terms here. Get a handle on yourself. Testing positive for anthrax exposure means exactly what it says. It means that they have been exposed to anthrax in some way shape or form. How much clearer can this be?
164 posted on
10/17/2001 9:31:17 AM PDT by
slimer
To: Sabertooth
Might I suggest using
Search
to educate yourself about anthrax.
167 posted on
10/17/2001 9:44:25 AM PDT by
slimer
To: Sabertooth
Hey Sabertooth, thanks for the tip (view replies) and thanks for keeping your head while some around you are losing theirs.
169 posted on
10/17/2001 10:07:00 AM PDT by
Hoboken
To: Sabertooth
Hey Sabertooth, thanks for the tip (view replies) and thanks for keeping your head while some around you are losing theirs.
170 posted on
10/17/2001 10:07:22 AM PDT by
Hoboken
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson