To: hellinahandcart
The only point I was trying to make (I have no opinion on the chaplain at all) is that as smith's post was not linked to the thread from which he was deriving his opinion, it looked "strange". Out of left field. Like he was just making up some stuff about the chaplain out of his imagination for no reason, when it was obviously derived from the previous night's thread(s?) on the FDNY Muslim anger over the appointment. His opinion may be totally wrong (like I say, I have no opinion on that), but as he was not the only one to suggest this, and as that opinion is derived from reading a legitimate news article, I didn't think it's justified to call him a troll or disruptor.
56 posted on
10/17/2001 12:30:17 PM PDT by
kaylar
To: kaylar
Look, I was on the thread you mentioned, and there was nothing even remotely similar to the psycho's claim that the "former" chaplain was piloting one of the planes that crashed into the WTC. The closest was one post suggesting that the chaplain had been killed by Muslim extremists---and since that chaplain was killed by falling debris at the site, that happens to be TRUE.
Every person who died that day was killed by Muslim extremists.
So I still say nobody but a psychopath or a disruptor could have come up with garbage like that. And jwsmith88 maligned a murdered Catholic priest for no reason. That's outrageous.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson