[Storm Orphan]

The letter to the Danbury Baptists shows specifically what the First Amendment's intent is.

Sorry, but you the evidence is against your position.

[Moby Grape]

Storm...I KNOW you are NOT so BLIND, and I don't think you are really so hard headed as to prentend against the clear evidence to still claim as you "pillar" of evidence, the Danbury letter. On an intellectual level, you are capable of better....The letter to the Danbury Baptist DOES NOT prove your point...Besides, the challenge issued was to PROVE your point Constiutionally...you did not.

[pulaskibush]

"The letter to the Danbury Baptists shows specifically what the First Amendment's intent is."

If that is the intent, then why isn't written that way?

This type of reasoning was almost used to determine votes by liberals losing another argument. Unless you have telepathic powers, "determining intention" is really you making it up for your own benifit.