[Arthur McGowan]

Why is this "spin." Why is it improbable? We have plenty of home-grown terrorists.

[nancetc]

I'm with you on this...I do not think it's improbable that this may be internal terrorism.

[laureldrive]

Yeah. Ever hear of Unabomber. He sent deadly mail, too.

[doberville]

Harvard professor is the result of "home grown" terrorism.

[winodog]

I agree and they all made anthrax a long time ago,got it ready to mail and just waited for Osama to give them the signal to put a stamp on em.

[texlok]

>Why is this "spin." Why is it improbable? We have plenty of home-grown terrorists.

No kidding, and that worries me more than if it was overseas terrorists. Makes sense, all the targets have, for the most part, been seen as liberals. The Islamic extremists have never targed the media, as a matter of fact the media has bent over backwards for many groups.

We have people here that will blow up abortion clinics and federal buildings, why not?

If it turns out to be right-wing extremists, the media should not bring the word 'Republican' anywhere into the discussion. If it's left-wing, 'Democrat' shouldn't be used. These people are nutcases and need to be called as such.

[cactmh]

Uhm, why is it that the nuts who flew into the WTC and Pentagon aren't being blamed for this?

[Doc On The Bay]

I'm probably wrong, here (please inform me if so), but, as I understand the process of "spreading" Anthrax as a "Bioweapon," the process of preparing Anthrax spores for airborne spread (Weaponization) requires a HUGELY expensive refining process (on a par with weapons-grade Plutonium!)

If this is even approximately true, HOW did ANY US Militia-types acquire this product??

Doc