Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

W I D E B O D Y strikes again!
News 12, The American Spectator | 10-15-01 | Mia T

Posted on 10/15/2001 11:16:34 AM PDT by Mia T

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-125 next last
To: FreeYourMind
Mia T is of sound neshama and ruach.
21 posted on 10/15/2001 12:20:59 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: HoweverComma
Hmmm, a senile pedestrian enters the road. Evidently you need a boy scout. Here let me help you ....

This is Mia T's style. It is her mark.

It is grand, and good and tasty -- pugent even.

Admittedly that is all subjective.

22 posted on 10/15/2001 12:23:41 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: Betty Jo; FreeYourMind
Touché, Betty Jo. ;)

 

The only way they can win is to convince people that we're space aliens.

--bill clinton

 
 
June 9, 1999
 
Peggy Noonan's excellent piece in yesterday's Wall Street Journal is really the story of the death of democracy. At its core it is the description of the human double helix gone terribly awry, of a denatured protein grotesquely twisted, of two mutant, tangled strands of DNA, the basest imaginable of base pairs linked permanently, as firmly as guanine to cytosine, bill inexorably to hillary and conversely, doing what they do best, and doing it relentlessly.
 
Killing.
Killing insidiously.
Killing as they pose and pander and feel our pain.
 
My only complaint is with Peggy Noonan's title.
The Mad Boomer, doesn't begin to capture candidate clinton considered separately or even taken as the self-anointed "twofer," permanently conjoined at that cavity conspicuously empty except for ego, that place where brain and soul and guts and heart normally reside.
 
This is not to say that she -- that they -- are not both quite mad and of that self-indulgent, arrogantly, ignorantly solipsistic age sandwiched flatly between yesterday's innocence and tomorrow's insouciance. Rather, it is that their madness and their boomerism don't even begin to explain their noxious influence: The cloying, internally inconsistent clinton calculus. The unspoken clinton threats. They permeate the atmosphere like a coiling miasma, choking off all freedom.
 
Even in New York.
Especially in New York.
When she wrote "The New Colossus," Emma Lazarus hardly had in mind this pair of mutant, deadly, twisted aliens.
 
So forget Arkansas-Illinois carpetbaggery and standard issue muckraking. The clintons are aliens of quite another sort. They are extrinsic, not of this world. They are inhuman. They are dehumanizing.
 
You may recall that the first act of this story of two degenerates maintained by iterating idiots, farce of farce ad infinitum, was generated quite by accident by iterated AlGoreRhythm, who, it should be noted, is now himself the object of iterated calculation by said degenerates who want iteration 2004 all for themselves.
 
And thus the odd bit of bloody Gore in Act II: The ugly sight of a corrupt, bottom-heavy hillary self-impaled on the horns of a Treason-Dilemma- masquerading-as-a-Third-Term-Dilemma-masquerading-as-a-Senate-stampede, for example, or bill's recent unsolicited, underwhelming Times interview on the Gore candidacy.
 
Act I was called "The Cook, The Thief, His Wife and Her Lover." Ostensibly the tale of the wife of a bloodthirsty crime boss who finds romance with a bland bookseller between courses at her husband's restaurant, it was in fact the Thyestean and moveable -- yet unmoving -- feast of hillary clinton at her husband's sham restitution. (Note the reciprocity. The sham restitution in Act II is all hillary's.)
 
Food, color coding, sex, murder, torture and cannibalism were the exotic (if mostly horizontal) fare in this beautifully filmed but brutally uncompromising modern memoir which passed as ancient fable about nouveau riche rapacity.
Not for the faint at heart, Purple Hearts or queazy stomachs, this depiction of the gross debasement of America was heavily peppered with irony and dark humor throughout.
 
Although she baked no cookies, didn't do illicit land or cattle deals and stood by no man, hillary clinton starred in the triple role of the Cook, the Thief and his Wife. Her lover was played at once vaporously and in workmanlike fashion by the ghost of Eleanor Roosevelt, with Janet Reno, between her stints rendering intermittent injustice for the Husband, as the reliable stand-in. Sidney Blumenthal was the stand-in for the Cook and Craig Livingstone the stand-in for the Thief. The last-minute addition of Christopher Hitchens as the snitch was a stroke of absolute genius notwithstanding its cerebral accident, its predictable-if-perfect pitch and its facile alliteration.
 
Although Act I had no rating, the new clinton soccer-mom directive will require a photo ID for any viewer without independent proof of illegal alien DNC or DNA sequencing.
 
 
In Act II, rabid anti-clinton voters, roughly 33% of the U.S. populace according to as-yet-unpodded pollsters, become increasingly aware that they are disappearing in droves and being replaced by alien pod replicas which have their physical attributes but lack all anti-clinton affect.
 
If Act I was a thinly veiled allegory about naked clintonism, then Act II is a parable about the plan for world domination by the Establishment, aged hippies in pinstripes all, with their infantile, solipsistic world view amazingly untouched by time.

INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS

 


25 posted on 10/15/2001 12:32:55 PM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ThreadKiller; bvw
No, it wasn't a compliment.

I don't care if it's her "style." So what if I'm a newbie? Does that make me unqualified to comment on the (completely nonexistent) aesthetic appeal of her posts?

Just because you CAN do something with HTML does not mean that you SHOULD do it.

26 posted on 10/15/2001 12:34:31 PM PDT by HoweverComma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
I think we got the point the first time.
27 posted on 10/15/2001 12:35:19 PM PDT by HoweverComma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Mark
Heh, I guess so. Still, posts like this aren't going to do anything but convince the convinced. I am impressed by your will and determination, Mia T! :)
28 posted on 10/15/2001 12:35:21 PM PDT by FreeYourMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Anything to gain attention ... anything! Next, she'll be opening her own mail, hoping to find a powder-filled envelope. Then, she'll gain the sympathy of Tom Brokaw who will restore her image to national television.
29 posted on 10/15/2001 12:42:08 PM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeYourMind
It is less a matter of obsession as a natural fixation on that which one truly hates and despises. The hate and despite stem from watching eight years of unprecedented criminality go unpunished, and mostly unreported by a controlled news media that Goebels would have been proud of.

I would agree with you that she should be left alone if she and the utter scum she calls a husband did the honorable thing and quietly left the scene. But, as long as the pair of them insist on keeping some part of the spotlight, they are both fair game.

30 posted on 10/15/2001 12:50:35 PM PDT by katana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bvw
good and tasty...

BAGEL

A Katz's delicatessen bump. 
(The best in New York City.) 
(Send  your boy in the Army a salami)
(It's a Jewish thang, ya wouldn't understand!)
--dennisw
 
Me, I prefer a New York bagel, some nova and a (fat-free) schmeer. . .
 
The bagel's attenuation, BTW,
has nothing whatever to do with triangulation,
Safire notwithstanding.
(The clintons analogize not to the bagel's substance but to its hole.)
 
The modern bagel is not trying to be a doughnut.
The doughnut-ization of the bagel is illusory.
The tough torus softened because of technology,
not demographics, or even demagogues. . .

It all boils down to boiling...

and, according to some bagel purists, New York water!
 
Real bagels are first boiled in a kettle,
then rinsed and cooled in a fresh water trough.
Only then are they baked.
 
The boiling process
reduces the starch and increases the gluten
to produce the real bagel's
characteristic leaden heft, golden brown thin crust and chewy center.
 
So-called bagel stores in recent years have skipped this very important step. They steam the bagels in a rack oven
producing the ubiquitous,
(and quite-by-accident doughnut-esque),
ersatz bagel.
 
Why this happened:
Real-bagel makers are dying off and taking their trade secrets with them.
Real-bagel making is more time- and labor-intensive.
Boiling reduces shelf-life...
Would that we had parboiled the co-presidents, too...
GEFILTE FISHY
 
The clintons:
Meshuga, tref, tsuris.
Shopworn shtick, schmaltz, tsimmes.
Ganef, schlemiel, schlimazel.
A crooked putz with a big schnozzle.
 
Nudnik, nebbish, tummler.
Two chachkas on Geraldo's mantle, two schnorrers.
Kibitzer, kvetch with chutzpah.
Yenta, spieler, two stuffed kishkas.

 


31 posted on 10/15/2001 1:08:41 PM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: HoweverComma
Hmm...I think this post is HTML/CSS terrorism. Plain text on plain white backgrounds, minimal graphics, and sticking to ONE point only--these are the marks of communications greatness.

 

"HTML terrorism." Very good. ;)
Are you, perchance, implying a moral equivalency with clintonTERROR?

As for your "ONE point only" rule, I maintain this post conforms, i.e., (clinton depravity is precisely the point).

And as for "plain white backgrounds," a better argument could be made for shrouding anything clinton in plain brown wrappers...or, in the case of the sherman tank, plain brown bags...

 

32 posted on 10/15/2001 1:14:03 PM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: HoweverComma

Does that make me unqualified to comment on the (completely nonexistent) aesthetic appeal of her posts?

Hmmm ... may one remark on how humble your opinion of yourself is?

It seems a very precious humility to you, for you use it so sparingly.

33 posted on 10/15/2001 1:18:03 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
My, my, my. Such testiness!

I despise the Cintons; but I see no reason to spend THAT much time on them. Honestly, that much CSS work and those huge bandwidth-hogging images make your argument--which, IIRC, is the POINT of posting--almost invisible.

Plain black text on a white background--what a concept. Just like how normal people like to read things! Having one major point per post: wow, another "dead white male" thingy that still works.

34 posted on 10/15/2001 1:24:03 PM PDT by HoweverComma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: bvw
Oh, wow. According to you, I shouldn't render my opinion on ANYTHING because to do so isn't "humble."

That's a mind-bogglingly arrogant thing to say; you're a fine one to complain about someone else's apparent lack of humility.

35 posted on 10/15/2001 1:27:24 PM PDT by HoweverComma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: katana

BUMP.

It isn't merely a matter of avenging the clintons.

The seeds the clintons have sowed will have negative ramifications for decades, if not for generations. (9-11 was only the beginning.) If we are to cure the clintons' malfeasance and malpractice, the clintons and their depravity must be exposed.That they refuse to leave the public arena makes this task even more imperative.


36 posted on 10/15/2001 1:32:17 PM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: HoweverComma
 

I despise the Cintons; but I see no reason to spend THAT much time on them.

 

SEE ABOVE

37 posted on 10/15/2001 1:41:01 PM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Maybe they had some white powdery substance to deliver to Bill.
38 posted on 10/15/2001 1:45:28 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: FreeYourMind; Mia T
the most disturbing post

Congrats on another excellent piece.

39 posted on 10/15/2001 1:53:05 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
I'm talking about wasting time on silly HTML/CSS stuff that detracts from your message, as well as bandwidth-hogging graphics. Trust me, HillBilly are NOT worth spending that much time on style sheets.

Make your point, be succinct, and avoid flashiness that overwhelms your message.

40 posted on 10/15/2001 3:11:21 PM PDT by HoweverComma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-125 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson