I'm afraid they do. Your contention was that the term "intrinsically disordered" did not represent the same idea as the term "intrinsically evil". I posted evidence from Church documents showing that these terms are in fact used interchangably in the context of discussion of the moral aspects of human sexuality. You have so far failed to post any evidence to counter mine; indeed, you have failed to support any of your positions evidentially, leaving the field to me. Therefore, I graciously accept your surrender.
Do words have any meaning to you? I repeat; there are only two instances where anything is called "intrinsically evil" in the Catechism...
The specific words "intrinsically evil" need not be used. Phrases like "intrinsically disordered", etc. are just other ways of expressing the same idea as the words "intrinsically evil", as you well know.
Why don't you just drop the subject? You know not wherof you speak.
My dear brother in Christ: dropping the subject is the last thing I intend to do. Allowing you to continue to spread your brand of well-intentioned but factually inaccurate and evidentially-unsupported anti-Catholic propaganda would be a disservice to the Church and a dereliction of my duty to defend the Faith. Instead, I will say a prayer during my Rosary this week especially for you, asking St. Joseph, Patron of the Universal Church, to intercede before the throne of his foster Son our Lord for your health, happiness, and better understanding of the one holy Catholic and apostolic Church.
God bless you.
B-chan
Give it up Reggie, you'll never get a straight answer from RobbyS.