That may or may not be true but I bet he understands "invincibly ignorant". :-)
II: That may or may not be true but I bet he understands "invincibly ignorant". :-)
Chastity is like when a priest doesn't diddle little boys. So that's one good understanding. Intrinsic evil is like when a priest does diddle little boys. But Chastity doesn't stop the priest being a homosexual. And saying that 'a homo not being chaste is intrinsically evil' is not the same as saying "homosexuality is a sin." I do understand "invincibly ignorant" - it's the level of stupidity at which one accepts two unequal propositions as being equal and then lauds them as being such.