The Neverending Story (The New Christian Chronicles)

Southern Baptists ending talks with Catholic Church ^ | 3/24/01 | AP

[Invincibly Ignorant]

I know there's a lot in there about how poor my church is at teaching people what Scripture really means. But at least there is evidence of my church trying to do such things.

I'll give ya that.

Which you yourself admitted was a good idea. Now where is the evidence of your church doing such things? It's almost like they didn't exist at all.

There ya go separating churches again. I have fellowship with all who believe (and we know what that word requires) in Christ. You're too stuck in your denomination.

[The_Reader_David]

You still have not replied to my post #467 on Thread 162 of the old system.

Also, if you think the differences between the Orthodox and the Roman Catholics are so trivial as to be analogized to a "barette", why do you spend so much time arguing against the modern conception of the Papacy?

[RnMomof7]

Hi al...Hows Amazing grace?

You are on the Bump list (ya do know you will get beat up on Huh?*grin*)

[biblewonk]

Hey wonk.....How ya been my man?

I've been good thanks and how about you? It's just about time for some more De Montfort isn't it?

I've been hearing about all of these different beliefs within Islam and I have to laugh. That rag they read isn't worthy to be torn up and made packaging material for a cheap gift bible and yet look at the vast differences in inperpretation among us 'Christians'. Imagine how useless it is to sit and analyze what Islam is suppose to be?

[The_Reader_David]

Glad to hear you have adopted the Orthodox position on ecumenism: We insist actual unity of belief is the standard, not just for unity in name, but for intercommunion.

[The_Reader_David]

I will second SoothingDave's question. Which doctrine expressed in the Niceo-Constantinopolitan Creed do you object to? (I'm making it easy on you: you only have to find a current liturgical text, not separate out the parts written at Niceae in 325 from the part written at Constantinople in 381.)

[SoothingDave]

Its the term they use for most non-catholics Reg. Just humor them

We just can't win. If we lump you all into one category you don't like it.

If we bring up the dreaded "28,000" categories, you don't like that either. :-)

SD

[RnMomof7]

AHHHHHHHHH a dogma on which we agree:>) Morning Mom! Have you come to play or just observe?

Ahhhhh I just stopped for a visit..I was going to throw a "petra" or two.. but decided just to say HI! *grin*

[Pelayo]

This statement says it all. You are admitting, just as the RCC says, that the Catholic layperson is not qualified to interpret the Bible.

Well yeah duh! "I have enough sense to know I don't have enough sense" And the Bible also says I shouldn't.

Why then do you even bother to read it at all?

Because I am directed by the Church to read it. As long as I don't start thinking I'm the only person who understands this or that verse, I'll be Ok.

[The_Reader_David]

You are correct. St. Constantine did lean toward the Arian position. He called the Council because he wanted peace in the Church, and was obedient to the decision of the bishops, despite their decision going against his inclinations.

As to claims "the Emperor" was in charge for many years, another case is instructive. St. Justinian was called to account by one of the Ecumenical Councils (I think the Sixth) for alleged monophysitical sympathies. He was obliged to compose a statement of faith to clear himself of heresy charges. That statement now is used as a prayer in Orthodox Divine Liturgies: the Prayer of St. Justinian the Emperor occurs just after the Second Antiphon.

[SoothingDave]

Glad to hear you have adopted the Orthodox position on ecumenism: We insist actual unity of belief is the standard, not just for unity in name, but for intercommunion.

It is our position in dealing with the mess we've made of the west. Now with you guys, well, we have a soft spot for ya. :-)

In times of grave need, that is.

SD

[Invincibly Ignorant]

We just can't win. If we lump you all into one category you don't like it.

Who said I didn't like it. I'm the one that caved in here.

If we bring up the dreaded "28,000" categories, you don't like that either. :-)

I believe Bass did a good job refuting the 28,000 denomination thing a few threads ago with an extra-biblical source, the yellow pages.

[OLD REGGIE]

Now the rest of your quotes are nice. You are perhaps under the illusion that Catholics don't think the Bible is the source for God's word and truth? It is.

Properly understood.

I understand that Catholics think the Bible is a source of God's word and truth as opposed to the source.

Does "properly" mean "imaginatively" to you. If so, I agree.

[dignan3]

"I appeal to you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that all of you agree and that there be no dissensions among you, but that you be united in the same mind and the same judgment. For it has been reported to me by Chlo'e's people that there is quarreling among you, my brethren. What I mean is that each one of you says, "I belong to Paul," or "I belong to Apol'los," or "I belong to Cephas," or "I belong to Christ." Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Or were you baptized in the name of Paul? I am thankful that I baptized none of you except Crispus and Ga'ius; lest any one should say that you were baptized in my name."

And Paul also tells us that we have "One Lord, one faith, one baptism" Eph. 4:5. The current state of Christendom is not one faith. Hence the qualifying distinctions. Trying to whitewash our differences are of no help to our common goal(I hope that is one of your goals) of unity.

And why is Paul calling Peter "Cephas"? I thought that Peter wasn't Rock. Oh, well.

Pray for John Paul II

[OLD REGGIE]

REGGIE: "O.K. call me "Protestant" if you want. I'll call you RC."

SD: "In the end, we get them all. Steven fought it for a long time too, but gave in at the end. :-)"

I almost have to agree with you. It is easier to say I'm "Protestant" than to explain just what I mean by "Christian". I will not accept "neo-Christian" though. (I know - it wasn't you.)

[pegleg]

Marvelous choice of words. So the Church was willing to accept "help" from the Emperor even though they had no choice. The Church was not in charge. The Emperor was, and Emperors would remain so for many years.

How do you know they had no choice? Why do you say the Church was not in charge? Do you even know what was discussed and decided upon at this council besides refuting the Arian heresy and writing a profession of faith we call the Nicene Creed?

Still waiting to hear how your group of Christians handled this Arian problem. Or is it as Steven described?

[dignan3]

You don't actually read such drivel, do you? I'm assuming you read their comments in some proper Catholic media, like the Wanderer.

Actually, I do read NCR. I read it because I enjoy watching the liberals squirm and to keep abreast of how they are trying to destroy the Church. Worry not though, I instantly read solidly orthodox Catholic magazines to wash my mind clear of any trace of NCR's lunacy.

Pray for the Vicar of Christ

[Invincibly Ignorant]

Still waiting to hear how your group of Christians handled this Arian problem. Or is it as Steven described?

Gasp!