Posted on 10/15/2001 3:24:28 AM PDT by kattracks
That way the NRA gets more funding, this is just the way liberals would take advantage of the situation.
We may not be able to convert them into true believers, but at least we would have the mandated funding to run the program.
As has been said on this forum the last month:
The sheeple are waking up.
Let's hope they stay that way.
Why do I get the feeling that a bunch of us use this tactic?
True; however, maybe now they will begin to see the error in their ways. Maybe.
Every time the latest catastrophe (Be it man made or natural) hits California this happens.
A short while later the state legislature is always back to business. Heck, they passed yet another anti-freedom gun-hating law in the aftermath of September 11th. They used the distraction of the press as cover.
A somewhat different tactic works with a new bird dog, though. Pick up your new pointer or setter puppy at the age of seven weeks, take it home, push it through the front door, close the door, ring the bell, and leave for several hours. When you get back, the puppy will be the newest member of your household.
You may be out on your ear, but the puppy will be IN!
I agree with your conclusion. This run on guns is a hysterical and ineffective response to terrorist action. Of course, if it is the beginning a vigilante action against the evil foreigners amongst us, then ........
Boonie Rat
MACV SOCOM, PhuBai/Hue '65-66
Much like going out to dinner with the wife (outfit, shoes, jewelry, "Honey, you look great, new outfit?" "No, I got this for XXXXX's wedding last year, don't you remember? (of course I don't remember, Hell I don't even remember the wedding!))
On election day you get to choose from the lesser of two evils; both being evil nontheless.
I use the opposite tactic occasionally. One evening I walked in with a M2 receiver and flopped it down on the floor. To the outraged "What the hell is that?"
I replied, "Half a gun - I have to go back and get the barrel out of the car"
The basic question that came next was "What do you need one of those for?"
Answer was "I dont need it. I wanted it, I could afford it, so I bought it." I keep threatening to get a medium caliber weapon (Unfortunately, that's not feasible since '68, but she doesn't know that), so when I get anything smaller, there aren't too many objections
"customers are snatching up handguns in the $100-$200 range"
$100-200? Pellet guns?
"People want to protect their families," Leung said. "This is not to say people don't have faith in the police."
They don't have faith in the police.
"customers are snatching up 9-mm. and .45-caliber pistols. "They aren't interested in carrying a gun for personal protection,"
Oh, yeah, gee, they're not interested in personal protection. They're taking that .45 to go duck hunting.
It will be interesting to see if the gunlaws do change. More importantly I hope that the saner members of our U.S. Supreme Court are reading these articles and seeing that the 2nd Amendment must survive.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.