Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: boston_liberty
No, there is no Florida tort such as outrage. In certain circumstances, a plaintiff can get punitive damages, though.

And I'd like to say I yield to no one in my dislike of Hooters. But I also don't believe in a jury assessing legal damages against a company based upon their dislike of the company. Although of course it happens all the time.

29 posted on 10/12/2001 10:58:25 PM PDT by Amore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Amore
Just because they are a "Hooters" girl doesn't mean they are completely stupid (even in Florida!}
32 posted on 10/12/2001 11:02:24 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Amore
While I disagree with your analysis of this case, it appears that our differences are honest ones. What, if anything, do you think Hooters owes this lady? My thinking is that they would have to owe her either the car or nothing at all. While they may settle for less than the car, it is clear in my mind that if there was some sort of "contract" related to the contest, she gets the car. If not, she gets nothing. Outside of pragmatic considerations, there is no middle ground that I can see.
36 posted on 10/12/2001 11:07:42 PM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson