Skip to comments.
Trump Wants Parachute
The Sun ^
| 12 October 2001
Posted on 10/12/2001 10:35:55 AM PDT by Asmodeus
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 last
To: Damocles
I read the marketing pep talk at their site.
Honestly, it's easier to learn how to use a descender safely than it is to jump off a building with a parachute. Most tall buildings are surrounded by other tall buildings making landing extremely dicey with no training.
An actual executive is more concerned about getting employees out than saving themselves. Cable descenders would probably do the trick. This is giving me an idea for retrofitting tall buildings with evac systems.
41
posted on
10/12/2001 1:35:13 PM PDT
by
no-s
To: Jarhead_22
Excellent plan. Can it work from 50 stories? 110 stories? Certainly the parachute schemes are not going to be effective from below 20 stories or so.
My experience with descending a rope is one 200' drop. But I was with a group of scouts, 10-14 years. If fat 40-year olds and 10-year old boys can do it without serious training, certainly average office workers can handle it.
42
posted on
10/12/2001 1:44:29 PM PDT
by
no-s
To: Asmodeus
"He suggested ropes and abseiling equipment might be a better choice."Ropes would burn in a fire. My suggestion would be to have heavy-duty chains which could be dropped from the roof or at intermediate elevations along the sides of the building. Someone could then utilize a clamp-like device which they could attach to the chain that would allow them to slide down at an acceptable speed. If this had been available at the WTC, those who had been trapped above the fires could have used chains on the non-fire side to reach floors down below.
To: no-s
My youngest son works in the Prudential Tower in Boston. He's really thought about buying a verrrrry long rope. He's not high enough to have a parachute do him any good.
44
posted on
10/12/2001 4:27:27 PM PDT
by
surrey
To: surrey
Ropes might burn up, but a cable, dropped from the roof and secured by fire/rescure workers below, could provide a "zip line" escape route for at least some people.
I've also seen emergency evac systems that were essentially an elastic sleeve/tube. You jump in the top, which looks like a giant funnel, then it guides you into the sleeve, which looks like an oversize sausage casing. The momentum of your descent is distributed against the walls of the sleeve as friction as you descend. You have some degree of control in your descent by pushing your arms out, etc. The large surface area and relatively slow speed keep you from getting friction burn. Not sure how that would work from extremely high altitudes, like the Twin Towers, but it could speed things up at the 20-30 story altitude, I'd bet.
CW
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson