Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnHuang2
That should put to rest the "revisionist" thesis that the Iraqis, and not Bin Laden, were responsible for 9/11. Not that the "invade the Middle East and 'colonize' it" crowd needs any evidence, or connection to the 9/11 atrocity, to start World War III....
2 posted on 10/11/2001 11:04:00 PM PDT by Justin Raimondo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Justin Raimondo
I don't see that it puts anything to rest. Assuming the story is correct the FACT is that Atta met with Iraqi intelligence. What they talked about, or which direction the information and or orders flowed, is speculation. They certainly weren't discussing football scores or anything else benign. While this is speculation, it's a pretty bet that whatever they were talking about was nothing good, especially not for the US, Israel, and/or the Saudi government. They, the Iraqis, has to know who he was and who he worked for, and likely as not they were discussing items of mutual interest. As the President said, a country or more properly it's leaders, are against terrorist acts aimed at innocents, or they are with them. Saddam and his government are with them.
5 posted on 10/11/2001 11:35:52 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Justin Raimondo
Are you for real? Just what in this piece convinced you that there is NO WAY that Iraq could be involved? What is put to rest, huh? Where did Atta get his intelligence, or understanding of newtworks,covert activity, etc? Did he get this off a Sally Struthers info-mercial, take a night course at the Learning Annex? Or was this agent such a long lost relative? If so, why didn't he meet him in Hamburg?

Get your head of the sand...

11 posted on 10/12/2001 1:30:07 PM PDT by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Justin Raimondo
Just when many thought you could sink no lower, you proved them wrong!

You really are just an apologist for Saddam, aren't you?

14 posted on 10/12/2001 1:39:26 PM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Justin Raimondo
"That should put to rest the "revisionist" thesis that the Iraqis, and not Bin Laden, were responsible for 9/11. Not that the "invade the Middle East and 'colonize' it" crowd needs any evidence, or connection to the 9/11 atrocity, to start World War III...."

Seems like the "everything's America's fault" crowd is easily convinced by a CNN article. I know you're an Iraqi cheerleader but I'm affraid it's going to take a little more than CNN to prevent Saddam from receiving justice.

22 posted on 10/12/2001 11:22:22 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Justin Raimondo
Darn...it's starting to look more and more like Saddam's fingerprints are all over the anthrax. I know that must be disappointing for you.
27 posted on 10/13/2001 9:11:44 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson