The Constitution is not just a trivial document that doesn't consider such "modern" infamies like terrorsm.
Ron Paul Rules.
1 posted on
10/10/2001 12:44:32 PM PDT by
Demidog
(rfisk@lycos.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
To: Demidog
...this bill is based on specific Constitutional powers and was seen as a remedy by our founders... Again, it looks like Ron Paul is the only person in the whole government who understands and folows his oath faithfully.
To: Demidog
Has Mr. Paul ever had a co-sponsor on any legislation that he has ever introduced? Just asking.
To: Demidog
We're dealing with Pirates here and a significant effort has been made by Ron Paul's team to create a legal definition for "Air Piracy" which would include hijackings.Even given the thick skulls of many of our CongressCritters, I should think that the majority would realize that hijacking a $120 million dollar Boeing 767 certainly constitutes "Air Piracy" -- whether or not you slam it into any buildings.
Marque these terrorists for Reprisal.
To: Demidog
bttt
To: Demidog
A Most Excellent Libertarian Bump!!!!
To: Demidog
"Ron Paul Rules." AMEN brother! Great job.
To: Demidog
Pirates. Yes! Exactly. At least that's a term I can put in print....but I have better names! Thanks, Demi!
205 posted on
10/10/2001 9:54:02 PM PDT by
AuntB
To: Demidog
Thank you for posting this. I just spoke with my congressman Joe Knollenberg on WJR radio in the 10 am edt hour (10-11) and informed him of the bills. I also urged the listeners to call their congressmen and get behind these bills. Rep. Knollenberg had not heard of them, btw.
212 posted on
10/11/2001 7:16:51 AM PDT by
FrdmLvr
To: Demidog
After spending considerable effort trying to show that the terrorist acts were caused by invasive, subjugating, plundering, oppressive, coercive, dispossesing US policies in the Middle East, a simple conclusion would be that the terrorists acts were retaliatory in nature. Is a response called for?
To: Demidog
The "Powers That Be" don't like us owning guns, they don't like us owning property, they don't like us earning too much money, they don't like us listening to alternative media...does anyone seriously think they'll accept the idea of individual Americans taking action against a foreign foe? It isn't a great leap from Americans acting independently against Osama bin Laden to Americans acting independently against a corrupt Senator. I don't expect they will allow any such precedents to be set.
To: Demidog
Someone is thinking in Congress.
To: Demidog
Arghh Matey!..I be a waitin many a year to bring me guns to bear on a fair target of plunder. Hoist the jib!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson